@Shrikanth: how do you manage multiple redundant configurations(isn' it?) ? I thought indexes would be separate when fields aren't shared. I don't need to import any data/ or re-indexing, if those are the only benefits for separate collections. I just index when a request comes/ new item is added to DB.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, shrikanth k <jconsult.s...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > Please refer below link for clarification on fields having null value. > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7332122/solr-what-are-the-default-values-for-fields-which-does-not-have-a-default-value > > logically it is better to have different collections for different domain > data. Having 2 collections will improve the overall performances. > > Currently am holding 2 collections for different domain data. It eases > importing data and re-indexing. > > > regards, > Shrikanth > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can some expert users please leave a comment on this ? > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Using a single node Solr instance, I need to search for, lets say, > > > electronics items & grocery items. But I never want to search both of > > them > > > together. When I search for electrnoics I don't expect a grocery item > > ever > > > & vice versa. > > > > > > Should I be defining both these document types within a single > schema.xml > > > or should I use different collection for each of these two(maintaining > > > separate schema.xml & solrconfig.xml for each of two) ? > > > > > > I believe that if I add both to a single collection, without sharing > > > fields among these two document types, I should be equally good as > > > separating them in two collection(in terms of performance & all), as > > their > > > indexes/filter caches would be totally independent of each other when > > they > > > don't share fields? > > > > > > > > > Also posted at SO: http://stackoverflow.com/q/19202882/530153 > > > > > > > > > -- >
