Hi,
Logically maintaining will be easy, as both collections are in
different folders.
Next, even thought making separate fields in one collection, at search
time if field list is not mentioned then results will be combination of
both domains. If this is mandatorily taking care at search/query level that
should be fine. Else in case of 2 collections, the search word can queried
at specified collection level easily with or without field list.
regards,
Shrikanth
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:32 PM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Shrikanth: how do you manage multiple redundant configurations(isn' it?) ?
> I thought indexes would be separate when fields aren't shared. I don't need
> to import any data/ or re-indexing, if those are the only benefits for
> separate collections. I just index when a request comes/ new item is added
> to DB.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, shrikanth k <jconsult.s...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please refer below link for clarification on fields having null
> value.
> >
> >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7332122/solr-what-are-the-default-values-for-fields-which-does-not-have-a-default-value
> >
> > logically it is better to have different collections for different domain
> > data. Having 2 collections will improve the overall performances.
> >
> > Currently am holding 2 collections for different domain data. It eases
> > importing data and re-indexing.
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > Shrikanth
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Can some expert users please leave a comment on this ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, user 01 <user...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Using a single node Solr instance, I need to search for, lets say,
> > > > electronics items & grocery items. But I never want to search both of
> > > them
> > > > together. When I search for electrnoics I don't expect a grocery item
> > > ever
> > > > & vice versa.
> > > >
> > > > Should I be defining both these document types within a single
> > schema.xml
> > > > or should I use different collection for each of these
> two(maintaining
> > > > separate schema.xml & solrconfig.xml for each of two) ?
> > > >
> > > > I believe that if I add both to a single collection, without sharing
> > > > fields among these two document types, I should be equally good as
> > > > separating them in two collection(in terms of performance & all), as
> > > their
> > > > indexes/filter caches would be totally independent of each other when
> > > they
> > > > don't share fields?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Also posted at SO: http://stackoverflow.com/q/19202882/530153
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
>
--
