Hi; As I said: "The first link you provided includes ElasticSearch: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL as a Document Store and plus a note that it is a search engine. What are the main differences between ElasticSearch and Solr that makes ElasticSearch a NoSQL store but not Solr. I think that these are conceptual things and such kind of references as like Wikipeda should not be the *only* reference." and so explained that there is nothing makes ElasticSearch a NoSQL store but Solr not:
I've added Solr as a NoSQL at Wikipedia. So, people may change their idea even it is not a reference. When people see Solr at Wikipedia page they can improve and edit it. I just wanted to start it. Thanks; Furkan KAMACI 2014-03-03 18:13 GMT+02:00 Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>: > For the record, I am +1 for somebody to add Solr to the NoSQL wikipedia > page, in much the same way that Elasticsearch is already there. > > From a LucidWorks webinar blurb: "The long awaited Solr 4 release brings a > large amount of new functionality that blurs the line between search > engines and NoSQL databases. Now you can have your cake and search it too > with Atomic updates, Versioning and Optimistic Concurrency, Durability, and > Real-time Get! Learn about new Solr NoSQL features and implementation > details of how the distributed indexing of Solr Cloud was designed from the > ground up to accommodate them." > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message----- From: Furkan KAMACI > Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:58 AM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr is NoSQL database or not? > > Hi; > > I said that: > > "What are the main differences between ElasticSearch > and Solr that makes ElasticSearc a NoSQL store but not Solr." > > because it is just a marketing term as Jack indicated after me. Also I > said: > > "The first link you provided includes ElasticSearch: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL > as a Document Store" > > I mean if you can add Solr to the wikipedia page but it is not a reference. > Because these are all "marketin terms" as like Big Data. You should > remember the definition of Big Data: "Data that is much more than you can > process with traditional methods" so it is not an exactly defined > definition. One can say Big Data for something but one can not. It is > similar to NoSQL. > > Thanks; > Furkan KAMACI > > > 2014-03-03 11:28 GMT+02:00 Charlie Hull <char...@flax.co.uk>: > > On 01/03/2014 23:53, Jack Krupansky wrote: >> >> NoSQL? To me it's just a marketing term, like Big Data. >>> >>> +1 >>> >> >> Depends very much who you talk to. Marketing folks like to ride the >> current wave, so if NoSQL is current, they'll jump on that one, likewise >> Big Data. Technical types like to be correct in their definitions :) >> >> C >> >> >> -- >> Charlie Hull >> Flax - Open Source Enterprise Search >> >> tel/fax: +44 (0)8700 118334 >> mobile: +44 (0)7767 825828 >> web: www.flax.co.uk >> >> >
