That's great Jeff! Thanks for sharing your experience. SOLR-5768 will make it even better.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5768 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Jeff Wartes <jwar...@whitepages.com> wrote: > > This is highly anecdotal, but I tried SOLR-1880 with 4.7 for some tests I > was running, and saw almost a 30% improvement in latency. If you¹re only > doing document selection, it¹s definitely worth having. > > I¹m reasonably certain that the patch would work in 4.6 too, but the test > file relies on some test infrastructure changes in 4.7, so I couldn¹t try > that without re-writing the test. > > > > On 3/16/14, 7:31 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <shalinman...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:49 PM, remi tassing <tassingr...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >>> >>> I've used the fl=id parameter to avoid retrieving the actual documents >>> (step <4> in your mail) but the problem still exists. >>> Any ideas on how to find the merging time(step <3>)? >> >>Actually that doesn't skip steps #4 and #5. That optimization will be >>available in Solr 4.8 (the next release). See >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1880 >> >>-- >>Regards, >>Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
