---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dragan RAKIC <[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]>
Date: 2 mars 2008 13:06
Subject: FW:
To: [&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]





*From:* Dragan RAKIC [mailto:[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]
*Sent:* Sunday, March 02, 2008 11:47 AM
*To:* [&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]
*Cc:* [&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]; 
[&#1045;-&#1055;&#1054;&#1064;&#1058;&#1040; 
&#1047;&#1040;&#1064;&#1058;&#1048;&#1035;&#1045;&#1053;&#1040;]
*Subject:*



*http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol3/No1/art13.html*

*Opinion No. 3*

On 20 November 1991 the Chairman of the Arbitration Committee received a
letter from Lord Carrington, Chairman of the Conference on Yugoslavia,
requesting the Committee's opinion on the following question put by the
Republic of Serbia:

Can the internal boundaries between Croatia and Serbia and between
Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia be regarded as frontiers in terms of public
international law?

The Committee took note of the *aide-mémoires*, observations and other
materials submitted by the Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia,
Macedonia, Montenegro, Slovenia and Serbia, by the Presidency of the
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) and by the `Assembly of the
Serbian People of Bosnia-Herzegovina'.

1. In its Opinion No. 1 of 29 November, published on 7 December, the
Committee found that `the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is in the
process of breaking up'. Bearing in mind that the Republics of Croatia and
Bosnia-Herzegovina, *inter alia*, have sought international recognition as
independent states, the Committee is mindful of the fact that its answer to
the question before it will necessarily be given in the context of a fluid
and changing situation and must therefore be founded on the principles and
rules of public international law.

2. The Committee therefore takes the view that once the process in the SFRY
leads to the creation of one or more independent states, the issue of
frontiers, in particular those of the Republics referred to in the question
before it, must be resolved in accordance with the following principles:

*First** - All external frontiers must be respected in line with the
principles stated in the United Nations Charter, in the Declaration on
Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and
Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United
Nations (General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV)) and in the Helsinki Final
Act, a principle which also underlies Article 11 of the Vienna Convention of
23 August 1978 on the Succession of States in Respect of Treaties.*

*Second** - The boundaries between Croatia and Serbia, between
Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia, and possibly other adjacent independent
states may not be altered except by agreement freely arrived at.*

*Third** - Except where otherwise agreed, the former boundaries become
frontiers protected by international law.* This conclusion follows from the
principle of respect for the territorial *status quo* and, in particular,
from the principle of *uti possidetis. Uti possidetis*, though initially
applied in settling decolonisation issues in America and Africa, is today
recognized as a general principle, as stated by the International Court of
Justice in its Judgment of 22 December 1986 in the case between Burkina Fase
and Hali (*Frontier Dispute*, (1986) Law Reports 554 at 565):

Nevertheless the principle is not a special rule which pertains solely to
one specific system of international law. It is a general principle, which
is logically connected with the phenomenon of the obtaining of independence,
wherever it occurs. Its obvious purpose is to prevent the independence and
stability of new states being endangered by fratricidal struggles...

*The principle applies all the more readily to the Republic since the second
and fourth paragraphs of Article 5 of the Constitution of the SFRY
stipulated that the Republics' territories and boundaries could not be
altered without their consent.*

*Fourth* - According to a well-established principle of international law
the alteration of existing frontiers or boundaries by force is not capable
of producing any legal effect. This principle is to be found, for instance,
in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly
Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the
United Nations (General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV)) and in the Helsinki
Final Act; it was cited by the Hague Conference on 7 September 1991 and is
enshrined in the draft Convention of 4 November 1991 drawn up by the
Conference on Yugoslavia.

[image: http://www.ejil.org/journal/j_images/blubvsps.gif]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Одговори путем е-поште