On 22.07.15 1:25, Phil Race wrote:

Is this the issue behind the somewhat cryptic "8130305: AudioSystem behavior depends on order that providers are located" ?
Yes, the order is changed, the test caused a problem in the latest reader, and the reset of stream was unnecessary, so the bug was not visible.

  80     public AudioInputStream getAudioInputStream(final InputStream stream)
   81             throws UnsupportedAudioFileException, IOException {
   82         stream.mark(200);
   83         try {
   84             final AudioFileFormat fileFormat = 
getAudioFileFormatImpl(stream);
You aren't wrapping the stream here. This is OK if it is called via one of the other
two methods that do, but can it not be called directly ?

Same for
public final AudioFileFormat getAudioFileFormat(final InputStream stream)

but it may not matter on the methods that just read a few bytes of header 
anyway ..
In both cases this stream is passed to the method by the user, so I guess this is responsibility of the user what the stream it is passed. All old readers do not wrap it before.



stream.mark(200);

seems arbitrary and I assume it was your calculation of the max likely to
be needed by any subclass but it would be good to add a comment about this.
I select the biggest value which was used in WaveFloatFileReader, all other readers used smaller value.



-phil.


In the fix I merge all implementations of getAudioXXX to the SunFileReader.

Note that I added a comment to the SunFileReader.getAudioFileFormat(InputStream) that implementation contradicts the specification, and it seems the javadoc should be updated? And I created a new issue about EOFException: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8131974

Also I have a related question about WaveExtensibleFileReader why it was not added to the spi.AudioFileReader? Because of this WaveExtensibleFileReader actually is never used. Is that intentionally?

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8013586
Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8013586/webrev.02
--
Best regards, Sergey.



--
Best regards, Sergey.

Reply via email to