t...@rek.tjls.com wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:15:16PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > t...@rek.tjls.com wrote: > > > > > What was added to libkern is much simpler than what's in libz (not just > > > because the libz sources are stylistically gross). It's not only meant > > > for use by libz. > > > > Even if so, it should be handled by .PATH.c: in libkern/Makefile.libkern > > to pull crc32.c, IMO. > > I disagree. For example, the unmodified crc32.c in libkern does byte > order checking at runtime, which is just pointless in the kernel.
Hm, then I was confused because the log message said "from zlib to libkern." > The > libz source is so dirty, if we have to clean it up at all for in-kernel > use, better, I think, to just extract the useful part of that file and > maintain it ourselves. BTW, can it be shared with userland libz etc? --- Izumi Tsutsui
