On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:19:42AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:43:25AM +0000, David Holland wrote: > > If some people do care, changing the perception might prompt someone > > to do something about it. Maybe. It's probably a good chunk of work > > and there's not much bang for the buck. > > I tried, but it's not obvious [PR 37434, if anyone cares].
Ugh, looks like a mess. > But my main point was: why bother with an extra directory for APM scripts > while > > - obvisouly nobody uses APM > - APM is expected to go away completely > - it is unclear how scripts could make use of the fact which subsystem > triggered the pmf event they are dealing with That is a reasonable conclusion, though. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
