On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:52:15PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > I still think it is useful and it should stay, just because the code is > so simple. It is not the best compressor, but it is a fast and easy to > understand one. If you don't think so, I'll remove it.
Like I said, I don't have a problem with a fast, small compressor. But it would strongly help to actually have a use case. As file format, I object it, e.g. it seems to have no real header etc. Joerg