On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:26:22PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > > > Like I said, I don't have a problem with a fast, small compressor. But > > it would strongly help to actually have a use case. As file format, I > > object it, e.g. it seems to have no real header etc. > > Does it even really define a file format? Seems reasonable to let > something else provide the container.
See question about use case :) Joerg
