On Fri Jan 28 2011 at 23:07:37 +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > additionally, userland is built with MKSOFTFLOAT=yes,
>
> Hmm.
>
> In that case, shouldn't we have different ${MACHINE_ARCH}
> for different binaries?
i think you're right. hmm, looking at the build cluster output there
seem to be very few sets shared between mips archs (i don't know the
details of how they are selected).
Do you have a naming suggestion? mipsebsf? should the mips64 archs be
renamed to follow the same convention?
--
älä karot toivorikkauttas, kyl rätei ja lumpui piisaa
