David Holland <dholl...@netbsd.org> wrote: > (Did you post the O_SEARCH changes for review? If so, I must have > missed them.)
No, I completely missed that it could be a problem. > In any event please revert at least the O_SEARCH changes. Once the > discussion of the semantics is finished, please post a new patch that > implements the conclusion of the discussion and doesn't suffer from > the points noted above. Well, as you said it is not exploitable, I'd rather wait for the discussion to settle before making changes again. Feel free to #ifdef notyet the lines if you are uncomfortable with them. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
