On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 05:59:25AM +0100, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > > (Did you post the O_SEARCH changes for review? If so, I must have > > missed them.) > > No, I completely missed that it could be a problem.
*cough* > > In any event please revert at least the O_SEARCH changes. Once the > > discussion of the semantics is finished, please post a new patch that > > implements the conclusion of the discussion and doesn't suffer from > > the points noted above. > > Well, as you said it is not exploitable, I'd rather wait for the > discussion to settle before making changes again. Feel free to #ifdef > notyet the lines if you are uncomfortable with them. I am, but I can't deal with it now or in the near future; please take care of it. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
