On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Frank Kardel wrote:
Completely agreed, That's why I proposed to consider struct bintime.
We can tackle various aspects of improving the implementations benefiting
from the improved APIs at any time later.
IMHO struct bintime is sufficiently powerful enough to cover the interface
stability requirements (nsec are already being split
by 4 with 4+GHz cycle counters - so something better than timespec should
already be in scope).
It seems that pretty much everyone is in favor of using bintime() for
the "raw" timestamp data in kernhist. I'll go ahead and start working
on the required changes.
+------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
+------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+
