On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 03:35:02PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 23/02/2018 à 15:07, Maxime Villard a écrit :
> > > Then figure out why not. Placing random pessimisation options all over
> > > the place is wrong.
> And also, could you expand a little bit about what is inherently wrong with
> putting -fno-shrink-wrap on CFLAGS and not DEFCOPTS?

The only valid reason for wanting -fno-shrink-wrap is to work around the
broken unwind logic in DDB. If you don't use or care about DDB, there is
no reason to want it. This is the same as with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
It just increases code size and slows things down.


Reply via email to