> On Dec 28, 2018, at 6:06 AM, Cherry G.Mathew <che...@zyx.in> wrote: > > I don't like the imperative in your tone. NVMM is the user of modloader, > not PVHVM. So if you feel like your usecase needs fixing, I'd say it's > your problem - or don't use modules, but see below.
...but as the person who committed the change that broke it, you're responsible. His use case didn't need fixing until you introduced weak symbols that our kernel loader can't currently resolve. -- thorpej
