> On Dec 28, 2018, at 6:44 PM, John Nemeth <jnem...@cue.bc.ca> wrote: > > However, having said that, I suspect that your work with PVHVM > (and presumably PVH after that) will make the idea of having seperate > modules for Xen obsolete. I.e. it appears to me that we're headed > to a world where a single kernel will work both on raw iron and > under Xen. Indeed, Xen x86(-64) modules should be completely compatible with normal x86(-64) modules. If they're not, it means we're leaking too much internal goo into the ABI. -- thorpej
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Cherry G . Mathew
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Maxime Villard
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Jason Thorpe
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Mathew, Cherry G.
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Jason Thorpe
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Mathew, Cherry G.
- Re: Weak x86 aliases John Nemeth
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Mathew, Cherry G.
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Mathew, Cherry G.
- Re: Weak x86 aliases John Nemeth
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Jason Thorpe
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Cherry G . Mathew
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Martin Husemann
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Mathew, Cherry G.
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Martin Husemann
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Cherry G . Mathew
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Paul Goyette
- Re: Weak x86 aliases Jason Thorpe