Source code looks good.  Do you have testcases?

I am just going to cut & paste those lines.  That's all you changed, right?

Henry Rich

On 10/1/2017 10:42 AM, 'Jon Hough' via Source wrote:
I have made a couple of minor edits and added some comments, and J syntax:
https://github.com/jonghough/jsource/blob/master/jsrc/cd.c   LINES 281 - 301

A couple of points.

(0&^) d. _1 gives a domain error. Possibly this is unwanted, I mean, it could 
be considered as a constant since 0^x = 1 in usual understanding, but Wolfram Alpha 
also has issues with this:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+0%5Ex

Negative bases for exponentials give complex results. This is mathematically 
correct, but thought I would mention it anyway.
e.g.
(_2&^) d. _1
           %&0.693147180559945286j3.14159265358979312@(_2&^) NB. correct see: 
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+(-2)%5Ex

Compare this to current J, where
(_2&^) d. _1
gives a domain error.
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 9/29/17, 'Jon Hough' via Source <sou...@jsoftware.com> wrote:

  Subject: Re: [Jsource] d. fix
  To: sou...@jsoftware.com
  Date: Friday, September 29, 2017, 12:15 PM
Sorry Henry, I somehow missed this email in my
  inbox.
I will get the fixes you need done this
  weekend.
Regards,
  Jon
--------------------------------------------
  On Mon, 9/25/17, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
Subject: [Jsource] d. fix
   To: "'Jon Hough' via Source" <sou...@jsoftware.com>
   Date: Monday, September 25, 2017, 1:06
  AM
John,     I finally have my PC back and
  would
   like to get your fix in before
   the next build, which is happening
  any
   day now.  However, I have issues
   with it:
1. Needs commentary.  The JE didn't
   have much to begin with & that
  needs
   to improve.  So at least put in
  enough
   commentary that a reader can tell
   what you are doing without reading
  the
   C code. I put in an average of
   about one line of comment for each
  line
   of C.  As it stands it will me
   more time than I care to spend to
   verify that what you are doing is
  valid.
As part of the commentary, translate
   those long calls [amp(ds(CDIV...] to
  J.
2. AT(x)==INT is no good, because
  there
   may be flags set in more
   significant bits of the type.  Use
   (AT(x)&INT)
When you respond, send me your new
   testcase (gddot, I think) and point
   me to the fix, perhaps by simply
   sending me the new cd.c.
hhr ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to