On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:45 AM Eric Iverson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that this problem could reasonably (and perhaps best) be solved > with J code. The numpy binary spec seems straightforward and maps closely > to the j binary rep. The structure level stuff (as opposed to data copying) > is closely related to what is done for json. > > This might be an interesting challenge to post to the programming forum. > My impression is that writing the NPY binary is relatively easy, parsing is trickier. I tend to trust a generated parser to handle the Python dict embedded in the format. As Raul said, this functionality is quite close to 3!:2 and 3!:1 -- Zhihao ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
