On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:40 PM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > You should not make any changes that will alter the sequence generated > by ?. . Improvements to ? are welcome.
Interesting. I'll need to redo my implementation of ?. then, for xnums (but I can apply what I did for this current version to the implementation of ?). That said... if the ?. sequence is a feature, I think we should have tests (presumably based on the values generated in some old version of J) verifying that we are in fact providing at least some reasonable prefix of those sequences. (I can put this on my list of things to do.) Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
