Got it, thanks. -- Raul
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:12 PM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I added such a test to g621.ijs - but I took your new values as the > standard. If you revert to keeping the previous values, you should > change the standard. > > Henry Rich > > On 11/22/2022 9:11 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:40 PM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You should not make any changes that will alter the sequence generated > >> by ?. . Improvements to ? are welcome. > > Interesting. > > > > I'll need to redo my implementation of ?. then, for xnums (but I can > > apply what I did for this current version to the implementation of ?). > > > > That said... if the ?. sequence is a feature, I think we should have > > tests (presumably based on the values generated in some old version of > > J) verifying that we are in fact providing at least some reasonable > > prefix of those sequences. (I can put this on my list of things to > > do.) > > > > Thanks, > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
