Your version of gmpn_com does not work in some cases. I have pushed a patch
to resurrect gmpn_com in non-window os.
A version of gmp_com for windows is also defined and to be tested in github
action. Let us see if that will work.


On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:11 PM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nope, I am still unable to reproduce this issue.
>
> I don't know what's going on here.
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 8:51 AM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I do not have any uncommitted changes.
> >
> > That said, I ran script/install-lnx.sh a few minutes ago, and it had
> > some new packages to install, along with some other changes. I'm
> > running a fresh build and test right now to see if the changes it
> > introduced will let me reproduce this issue.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 8:43 AM bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you have any uncommitted changes in your computer?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 21:41 Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes: 8e379fd90153baae7624401ddb1aaa16f3179cd4
> > > >
> > > > Very odd.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Raul
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Raul
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 7:51 AM bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I tested on apple m1 and the following 3 tests failed.
> > > > > g641
> > > > > gqco
> > > > > gxco1
> > > > >
> > > > > The sha1 for the latest commit in the master branch is
> 8e379fd90153 , is
> > > > > this the same on your machine?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 3:54 PM bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Nearly all platforms failed on GitHub action.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 14:13 Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> No errors, still, on my machine, for script/buildga.sh linux &&
> > > > > >> script/testga.sh linux
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I don't know if this means that my machine is defective or
> deficient
> > > > > >> in some way, of course.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> FYI,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Raul
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:33 AM Raul Miller <
> rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I tested on the master branch. I'll do a fresh compile and
> test
> > > > again,
> > > > > >> > though, since I've nothing better to do on this issue.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > --
> > > > > >> > Raul
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 11:28 PM bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Are you two both testing on the master branch?
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:02 Raul Miller <
> rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > I have been unable to reproduce this issue.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > $ time j64/jconsole -lib libjavx2.so -js "exit i.0[RECHO
> > > > > >> > > > testfiles'g641'[load'test/tsu.ijs'"
> > > > > >> > > > see: tsu_notes, tsu_usage, tsu_pacman, and tsu_jd
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >    RUN  ddall  NB. report scripts that fail
> > > > > >> > > >    RECHO ddall NB. echo script names as run and final
> count of
> > > > > >> failures
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > j9.5.0-beta8/j64avx2/linux/commercial/
> > > > > >> > > >
> www.jsoftware.com/2023-12-03T17:50:19/clang-14-0-6/SLEEF=1
> > > > > >> > > > cpu x86_64 cores 4
> > > > > >> > > > /mnt/c/Other/jsoftware/jsource/test/g641.ijs
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > real    0m7.961s
> > > > > >> > > > user    0m0.201s
> > > > > >> > > > sys     0m1.803s
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > FYI,
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > --
> > > > > >> > > > Raul
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 8:02 PM Bill Heagy <
> whe...@bell.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >     JVERSION
> > > > > >> > > > > Engine: j9.5.0-beta8/j64avx2/linux
> > > > > >> > > > > Build: GPL3/2023-12-03T19:45:50/clang-16-0-6/SLEEF=1
> > > > > >> > > > > Library: 9.5.5
> > > > > >> > > > > Platform: Linux 64
> > > > > >> > > > > Installer: unknown
> > > > > >> > > > > InstallPath: /home/wheagy/git/jsource/jlibrary
> > > > > >> > > > > Contact: unknown
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > .....
> > > > > >> > > > >     'domain error' -: 2 ?. etx 2 3;4 5
> > > > > >> > > > > 1
> > > > > >> > > > >     'domain error' -: 2 ?.~etx 2 3;4 5
> > > > > >> > > > > 1
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >     'domain error' -: ?.~@(*/) etx 'abc'
> > > > > >> > > > > 1
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >     'length error' -: 2 3 ?. etx 4 5 6
> > > > > >> > > > > 1
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >     270869761 1880044261 -: q: 509247139646491621x
> > > > > >> > > > > |nonce error in ex02, executing monad q:
> > > > > >> > > > > |this computation is not yet supported
> > > > > >> > > > > |   270869761 1880044261-:    q:509247139646491621x
> > > > > >> > > > > |[-66] /home/wheagy/git/jsource/test/g641.ijs
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On 12/3/23 19:11, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > Ok, changes pushed. I believe I've a working update
> for
> > > > > >> jtxplus, and I
> > > > > >> > > > > > believe it's portable to all supported architectures.
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > I'll keep an eye out for issues. If all goes well, I
> intend
> > > > to
> > > > > >> start
> > > > > >> > > > > > working through some of the other X primitives (and,
> > > > > >> eventually, the
> > > > > >> > > > > > RAT primitives). If I have to hold off at some point
> for
> > > > release
> > > > > >> > > > > > management purposes, I think that that should be fine
> - this
> > > > > >> effort
> > > > > >> > > > > > can be completed in J9.6 or whenever.
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > > > For information about J forums see
> > > > > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > > For information about J forums see
> > > > > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > For information about J forums see
> > > > > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> For information about J forums see
> > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to