No, not only a private branch. I took your message https://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/source/2023-December/001628.html as an indication that I should push what I had working to the main branch.
That said, I see what happened. Though I'm baffled how it did not fail on my machine. mpn_com is supposed to implement a bitwise negation of a span of gmp limbs. It's mpn_neg which is supposed to implement the two's complement of that span. I misremembered these details and implemented in my jmpn_com the logic of mpn_neg. That should never have worked in any examples of negating an extended integer I can think of. And yet it repeatedly passed tests on my machine. I don't understand how that was possible. I guess I'm going to spend some time looking at intermediate results before I go any further with this project. Thanks, -- Raul On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 9:54 AM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I can't get this to fail. Even > > q: 1000 $ 509247139646491621x > > works. The problem is that q: is nondeterministic for large numbers. > It usually works, but sometimes not. I will replace the q: with q: :: > q: and hope that doesn't fail. > > @Raul: you have pushed your changes only to your private branch, right? > > hhr > > On 12/3/2023 8:02 PM, Bill Heagy wrote: > > JVERSION > > Engine: j9.5.0-beta8/j64avx2/linux > > Build: GPL3/2023-12-03T19:45:50/clang-16-0-6/SLEEF=1 > > Library: 9.5.5 > > Platform: Linux 64 > > Installer: unknown > > InstallPath: /home/wheagy/git/jsource/jlibrary > > Contact: unknown > > > > > > > > ..... > > 'domain error' -: 2 ?. etx 2 3;4 5 > > 1 > > 'domain error' -: 2 ?.~etx 2 3;4 5 > > 1 > > > > 'domain error' -: ?.~@(*/) etx 'abc' > > 1 > > > > 'length error' -: 2 3 ?. etx 4 5 6 > > 1 > > > > 270869761 1880044261 -: q: 509247139646491621x > > |nonce error in ex02, executing monad q: > > |this computation is not yet supported > > | 270869761 1880044261-: q:509247139646491621x > > |[-66] /home/wheagy/git/jsource/test/g641.ijs > > > > On 12/3/23 19:11, Raul Miller wrote: > >> Ok, changes pushed. I believe I've a working update for jtxplus, and I > >> believe it's portable to all supported architectures. > >> > >> I'll keep an eye out for issues. If all goes well, I intend to start > >> working through some of the other X primitives (and, eventually, the > >> RAT primitives). If I have to hold off at some point for release > >> management purposes, I think that that should be fine - this effort > >> can be completed in J9.6 or whenever. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
