I don't believe there is a maximum number of files or size of archive for SJ. This would only be limited by the size of the hard disk where your SJ archive is stored. I don't think SJ gets slower or less reliable based on the size of the archive. The only limitiation I would expect SJ to have would be with the number of concurrent users. I don't know the exact limit because I've only used SJ with relatively small teams, but I'd guess that you might run into problems if you have more than 50 people hitting the same archive on a regular basis. This is just a guess, though. The number could be higher or lower.
--Rob --- Nishit J Desai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Can anybody tell me what is the maximum size and number of files > sourcejammer can handle reliably? > I have heard that reliability of sourcejammer is very less if the size of > my archive crosses 1 GB. And moreover > it becomes very slow with increasing number of files and datasize on > server. > > Please let me know how much dataload SJ can handle effectively? > > > Thanks, > > > Nishit Desai > Application Developer > Prestige Opal, > 146, Infantry Road, > Bangalore 560 001 INDIA > Cell : 91-9945282686 > Desk : 91-80-51367386 > Extn : 91-80-51332276 x 7386 > Fax : 91-80-51298500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "A ship in a harbour is safe, but that is not what ships are built for." - > William Shedd > > > > > Deanna J Peugeot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 21/10/2005 18:17 > > To > Robert MacGrogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc > sourcejammer-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject > Re: [SourceJammer-users] Converting from SourceJammer > > > > > > > > Thanks for the information. I'll be sure to Give the community my code > when I'm done! > > Deanna > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of > e-mail for such purpose. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Robert MacGrogan <robertmacgrogan > @yahoo.com> > 10/20/2005 09:21 PM > > To: Deanna J Peugeot/DEF/[EMAIL PROTECTED], > sourcejammer-users@lists.sourceforge.net > cc: > Subject: Re: [SourceJammer-users] Converting from > SourceJammer > > > > Hi, Deanna. > > Yes, SJ has a very decent command line. Just run the batch file > sj_client.bat in the root client > directory after you install. One limitation is that you will have to run > the client on a box that > can run a GUI, even though the CL is strictly CL. It won't run on a Sun > box without X Windows > installed, for example. > > You need to specify the URL for the server in the sj_client.bat file. > Should be pretty easy to > figure out. Just type "help" at the prompt to get a list of commands. One > other trick: One command > is not listed in the help for some reason. The command to view a list of > versions of a file is > "ver [filename]". > > The CL is not aware of shares, so watch out for that. I don't think it can > work with the current > label architecture (it's a little bit dusty). You might end up just > skipping any labels or > re-creating them in Clear Case, which will probably not be too great a > burden. > > One other option you might consider if you know your way around Java is > the SimpleInterface class, > which provide a relatively simple way to automate the SJ client code. > > Best of luck. Any chance of you open-sourcing your SJ to CC tool? It might > be nice for potential > SJ users to know it's not a dead end if they decide they need to switch. > > --Rob > > > --- Deanna J Peugeot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We're a Rational ClearCase shop (sorry, but it's actually in our > contract, > > so I can't change it). We've just been given another company's codebase > > > which is archived in SourceJammer. One of the first things I want to do > > > is move this over into ClearCase so our developers can start modifying > the > > code. Which poses some difficulties, as I'm sure you can guess. > > > > Has anyone attempted this? If not, does SourceJammer have a decent > > command line which I can use to get specific versions of files and all > > label information? If it does, I can bastardize the current ClearCase > > conversion scripts to do this. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Deanna > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please > > > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in > > delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to > > bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit > > written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use > of > > e-mail for such purpose. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
