it's here: http://jucr.opensolaris.org/build/viewlog/1079/
2009/5/5 Dermot McCluskey <Dermot.McCluskey at sun.com>: > Chris, > > Can you touch the spec file, so it kicks off a build? > I see a comment from Christian that he eventually > got it to build successfully, but I only see failed blender > builds on the build page. > > > - Dermot > > > > > > On 05/05/09 07:34, C Wang wrote: >> Team: >> Can someone review the spec for blender, I will need a +1 to put it into >> pending repo. >> >> A OSR for blender has already been approved, for Sun employee, please >> refer to >> >> Open Source Review #10682 >> >> Thanks >> Chris >> >> >> Christian Kelly ??: >>> C Wang wrote: >>> >>>> Christian: >>>> I need someone to review the blender.spec and give a +1 to move the spec >>>> to Pending repository. Do you know any mail aliasing I can send to those >>>> who have the specified privilege? >>>> >>>> >>> You can ask for a review on sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org. You >>> need an OSR to be able to put your package in an external repo. Do you >>> have an OSR? >>> >>> _Christian >>> >>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> >>>> Christian Kelly ??: >>>> >>>> >>>>> C Wang wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Christian: >>>>>> I submitted the spec-file for blender last week, and I found the spec is >>>>>> fail to build with sourcejuicer with the error message: >>>>>> >>>>>> **pkgbuild: ## Validating control scripts. >>>>>> pkgbuild: ## Packaging complete. >>>>>> pkgbuild: Calling script /packages/PKGMAPS/scripts/blender_ips.sh >>>>>> pkgbuild: pkgsend: open failed (status 400) >>>>>> ** >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> The problem here is having letters in the package version. The version >>>>> was something like 2.3a. This causes the IPS publishing to fail. I tried >>>>> to fix it, but didn't get it all the way fixed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> and it seems that all recently submitted spec file are hit the same >>>>>> problem, do you have any idea of it. Also, I found it seems that the >>>>>> sourcejuicer is not support %doc grammar yet, is it true? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Sourcjuicer *does* support %doc. >>>>> >>>>> _Christian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss > _______________________________________________ > sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list > sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss > -- Andy http://blog.sartek.net
