yes, i know that's it's not documented yet :( but it's required the pkg.detailed_url is basically the Url: from the spec file so in your case: Meta(pkg.detailed_url): http://www.blender.org
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:54 AM, C Wang <Chris.Wang at sun.com> wrote: > Andras: > Thanks for the response. I found the example on how to fill up the Metainfo > in > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/sw-porters/contributing/specdesc/nano.spec.txt > but it has no pkg.dtailed_url item, can you let me know what this > pkg.detailed_url indicated. > > Thanks, > Chris > > Andras Barna ??: >> >> it's in the pending repo! >> >> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/info/0/blender%402.48%2C5.11-0.101%3A20090417T163755Z >> >> please add the Meta() things! >> >> Meta(info.upstream): >> Meta(info.repository_url): >> Meta(info.maintainer): ___name____ <__email__> >> Meta(pkg.detailed_url): >> >> >> >> 2009/5/5 C Wang <Chris.Wang at sun.com>: >> >>> >>> Team: >>> Can someone review the spec for blender, I will need a +1 to put it into >>> pending repo. >>> >>> A OSR for blender has already been approved, for Sun employee, please >>> refer to >>> >>> Open Source Review #10682 >>> >>> Thanks >>> Chris >>> >>> >>> Christian Kelly ??: >>> >>>> >>>> C Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Christian: >>>>> I need someone to review the blender.spec and give a +1 to move the >>>>> spec >>>>> to Pending repository. Do you know any mail aliasing I can send to >>>>> those >>>>> who have the specified privilege? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> You can ask for a review on sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org. You >>>> need an OSR to be able to put your package in an external repo. Do you >>>> have an OSR? >>>> >>>> _Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Christian Kelly ??: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> C Wang wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christian: >>>>>>> I submitted the spec-file for blender last week, and I found the spec >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> fail to build with sourcejuicer with the error message: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **pkgbuild: ## Validating control scripts. >>>>>>> pkgbuild: ## Packaging complete. >>>>>>> pkgbuild: Calling script /packages/PKGMAPS/scripts/blender_ips.sh >>>>>>> pkgbuild: pkgsend: open failed (status 400) >>>>>>> ** >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem here is having letters in the package version. The version >>>>>> was something like 2.3a. This causes the IPS publishing to fail. I >>>>>> tried >>>>>> to fix it, but didn't get it all the way fixed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and it seems that all recently submitted spec file are hit the same >>>>>>> problem, do you have any idea of it. Also, I found it seems that the >>>>>>> sourcejuicer is not support %doc grammar yet, is it true? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sourcjuicer *does* support %doc. >>>>>> >>>>>> _Christian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- Andy http://blog.sartek.net
