Why don't we put promotions on hold until the dependency issue is fixed? Ploticus will probably work ok without having any package dependencies listed in its manifest as it seems to only depend on what I'll call 'core' packages, but that's not really the point, is it? We probably shouldn't be promoting packages just because they were fortunate enough to work in spite of this bug.
It's a community issue, what do others think? Should promotion be based purely on the package working on a standard OpenSolaris build or should all packages be required to correctly list any dependencies? Amanda Mark Duggan wrote: > Hi Josh, > > You might get a quicker response by posting to sourcejuicer-discuss. > I just gave the package a +1. Now you another vote before promotion. > > Regards, > > Mark > > > > On 06/05/09 21:35, Josh Simons wrote: >> Hi, Porters. >> >> Is a note to this list requesting promotion the correct way to move a >> pkg >> from pending to contrib? Is there anything else I need to do? >> >> Josh Simons >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Josh Simons <joshua.simons at sun.com> >>> Date: June 2, 2009 3:43:38 PM EDT >>> To: sw-porters-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> Subject: Request for promotion: Ploticus >>> >>> I've built Ploticus (http://ploticus.sourceforge.net) using >>> SourceJuicer and >>> have installed and tested the package on 2009.06. (The Juicer >>> 'Install' link is >>> excellent, BTW.) >>> >>> I had to apply some minor patches to the community tarball to fix a >>> bug that prevented the package from being built correctly. The patches >>> have been given back to the community and I hope to see them >>> incorporated in the next community release. The bug was not >>> peculiar to OpenSolaris. >>> >>> I am requesting: >>> >>> pkg:/ploticus at 2.41,5.11-0.101:20090601T230557Z >>> >>> be promoted to contrib. >>> >>> Review details: http://jucr.opensolaris.org/review/packages/429/ >>> Build details: http://jucr.opensolaris.org/build/viewjob/1605/ >>> >>> Josh Simons >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sw-porters-discuss mailing list >> sw-porters-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sw-porters-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list > sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
