On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Amanda Waite wrote:

> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 +0100, Amanda Waite wrote:
>>
>>> Any idea why some in some of the packages built from a spec file,  
>>> the likes of SUNWzlib and SUNWcsl show up but in others they  
>>> don't. The
>>
>> Can you give an example where they show up in the manifest?
>>
>
> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/review/packages/429
>
> Produced:
>
> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/manifest/0/ploticus%402.41%2C5.11-0.101%3A20090519T165316Z
>
> and then 2 weeks later, produced:
>
> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/pending/manifest/0/ploticus%402.41%2C5.11-0.101%3A20090601T230557Z
>
> Josh (who submitted it) will know if anything changed in the spec  
> file between the builds, but the latest package was built with the  
> spec file that's there currently.
>

Basically, two things changed: I added some patches and I uncommented  
the Meta() tags
in the file, which I had accidentally overlooked. The original had no  
Meta tags.

See the diff for details: 
http://jucr.opensolaris.org/files/429/2031/spec/ploticus.spec.diff

Josh


>>
>>> implication is that on some of the build zones these are available  
>>> as IPS packages and on others they are available as SVR4 packages  
>>> and that only the IPS versions appear as dependencies in the  
>>> manifest.
>>>
>>> Also Christian says that the zones have a minimal set of packages  
>>> installed (SVR4 packages), which means the vast majority of  
>>> packages would be installed from IPS which suggests that the issue  
>>> should only affect the base packages. If Drupal wants SUNWapch22  
>>> it should be installed from IPS and then SUNWapch22 would appear  
>>> as a dependency in the manifest. It doesn't.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm... SUNWapch22 is a Requires, not a BuildRequires, so I suspect
>> that jucr does not install it in the build zone.  Which is  
>> interesting,
>> because this is a situation that pkgbuild needs to be able to deal
>> with, even though the package is not installed.  I will have to think
>> about this.
>>
>
> We have lots of examples of that problem.
>
> Amanda
>
>> Laca
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sw-porters-discuss mailing list
> sw-porters-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sw-porters-discuss


Reply via email to