just exclude "%include default-depend.inc"
other deps like ruby will collect needed stuff

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Amanda Waite<Amanda.Waite at sun.com> wrote:
> Well the point is that SUNWcsu and SUNWcsr aren't actually specified in the
> spec files of the apps for which the builds are failing, Jucr is adding
> them.
>
> All I have for Rails is:
>
> Requires: ? ? ?SUNWruby18
> BuildRequires: ? ? ?SUNWruby18
>
> And OpenGrok (Lubos) has:
>
> %include default-depend.inc
> BuildRequires: SUNWj6dev
> BuildRequires: SUNWant
> BuildRequires: SUNWjunit
> Requires: SUNWj6rt
>
> This started happening just as Christian fixed the issue with
> 'BuildRequires:' directives not being honoured.
>
> Amanda
>
>
>
>
>
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>>
>> Amanda Waite wrote:
>>>
>>> Lubos Kosco wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Christian Kelly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We rolled out a new version of the jucr code yesterday. We were seeing
>>>>> some glitches where dependencies defined in the spec file were not being
>>>>> installed to the build zone. I believe this is now resolved. If see any
>>>>> issues like this, please let us know.
>>>>
>>>> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/build/viewlog/2077/
>>>>
>>>> seems %include default-depend.inc
>>>> now results in "some" packages unknown ?!?!
>>>> (I even got rid of it, no luck)
>>>
>>> Same with me:
>>>
>>> [job 2081 : Phase 0] BUILDING on zone zone090601
>>> [job 2081 : Phase 0] Job depends on the following pkgs: ? SUNWcar SUNWkvm
>>> SUNWcsr SUNWcsu SUNWcsd SUNWcsl SUNWruby18
>>> [job 2081 : Phase 0] Install IPS failed
>>> STDOUT:
>>> STDERR:
>>> pkg: The following pattern(s) did not match any packages in the current
>>> catalog.
>>> Try relaxing the pattern, refreshing and/or examining the catalogs:
>>> ? SUNWcsr
>>> ? SUNWcsu
>>>
>>> As Lubos says, you get the same result when commenting out %include
>>> default-depend.inc
>>
>> Because those packages don't exist on OpenSolaris (directly). ?Those are
>> the old SVR4 package names. ?You want SUNWcs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> _______________________________________________
> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>



-- 
Andy
http://blog.sartek.net

Reply via email to