Dermot McCluskey wrote: >>> ... which would likely mean that Jucr is doing the builds on Nevada >>> machines (instead of OpenSolaris), which, IMO, would be naughty. >>> >> It *was* until this latest version, but my understanding was that >> we're now on >> OSOL... > > > Correct - the prob. was that the default-depend file which is > often included in specs still listed some Nv-only package > names. > > The fix is proving a little trickier than expected, but it's > being worked on.
It's not just the that that's a problem. If you update an existing spec file (for example to remove '%include default-depend.inc'), you see the diffs on the review page but Jucr builds with the older, un-updated spec file. Even if you create a new submission with new files but with the same filenames it still uses the old spec file. I seem to not be able to write a spec file without typos and because of the above I'm not able to fix them, therefore I have lots of failed builds in the list. Sorry about that :o/ Thanks Amanda > > > - Dermot > > _______________________________________________ > sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list > sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
