> but: we'll face a problem with nexuiz > the source is 600megs so src packages cant be made.
> i hope laca will have an idea how to fix this So, if I understand correctly, the problem is that you can't pkgsend files >100MB over http. A quick workaround is setting a NoSource tag for that file, e.g. Source1: http://somesite.org/huge.tar.gz NoSource: 1 This means that Source 1 will not be included in the source package. It also means that we have a legal issue, so this is really just a workaround. (Note: we don't currently post source packages, so it's not really an issue just yet.) A better fix is asking the upstream community to break it up into more manageable pieces. And finally, when we do implement posting source packages in Jucr, we will have to set the source repo to a local one, not a http URI. Laca > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Brian Nitz<Brian.Nitz at sun.com> wrote: > > I'd like to promote the following packages to /contrib in the next round. > > dmidecode at 2.10,5.11-0.111:20090805T221219Z > > Xaw3d at 1.5,5.11-0.111:20090829T231624Z ht > > fortune at 9708,5.11-0.111:20090805T190618Z > > ruby-rails at 2.3.3,5.11-0.111:20090820T175446Z > > > > Please let me know if there are any objections or if there additional > > packages you feel are ready to promote. > > _______________________________________________ > > sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list > > sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss > > > > >
