Brian Nitz wrote: > Thanks Amanda > > On 09/30/09 13:04, Amanda Waite wrote: >> GLPK has been updated as with an essential fix, I've voted on that >> but it needs another vote and promotion: >> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/review/packages/829/ > O.K. I've suggested that we add a feature which resets the + votes on > resubmit during a future release to help identify packages such as > these in need of a new review.
I've been thinking that we should lock any submissions that get +2 votes so that they can't be modified prior to promotion and then require a new submission for any updates, maybe with the ability to clone submissions. Your way works too, but I have this nagging fear that we'll vote a package in only to have it modified prior to promotion such that it either no longer works or it does something malicious. > >> >> dhcp has one +1 vote from me >> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/review/packages/1323 > It looks like this is already in contrib: > > http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib/info/0/dhcp%404.0.0%2C5.11-0.101%3A20081209T221907Z > > > > It didn't come from sourcejuicer. Do you think Robert Milkowski's > version should supercede that one? Yes, Robert explained in his promotion request to the alias that this improves upon the one that's there. To quote: "The spec file is based on current dhcp package in contrib which was "robo-ported". The main changes I did: - upgraded to latest stable release - included SMF manifest - moved configuration file to /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf - paths in man pages are updated " Thanks Amanda > > >> >> perl-version has one +1 vote from me >> http://jucr.opensolaris.org/review/packages/1176 >> >> That's all I can find at the moment >> >> Amanda >> >> Brian Nitz wrote: >>> Today I only see two candidates which have prerequisites to be >>> promoted to contrib: >>> >>> telepathy-glib Elaine Xiong >>> phpMyAdmin Sumit Sati >>> >>> Would anyone like to nominate additional packages which have built >>> and meet the other prerequisites for promotion but which haven't >>> been reviewed and need another +1 vote? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >> >
