Field Dispatch: Kabila after Five Years: A Personal Retrospective
in Raise Hope for CongoEastern CongoField ReportHuman Rights
Fidel Bafilemba
Nov 8, 2011
With the Congolese elections just three weeks away our researcher in
Goma, Fidel Bafilemba, considers President Kabila’s tenure and what
the future may hold for the Congo.

For incumbent politicians, elections are often referendums on their
past performance in office. Issues such as service delivery,
stability, and economic development are in the forefront of voters’
minds. Despite setbacks, criticism, and conspiracy theories, Congolese
authorities have insisted that on November 28, 2011 voters will go to
the polls to cast their ballots for president. Delays in printing
candidates and voters lists, mapping polling stations, and shipping
ballot boxes and other electoral materials are a few of reasons why a
coalition of local and international human rights organizations have
urged a postponement. However, the chairman of the Congolese
Independent Electoral Commission chairman, known by its French acronym
CENI, Pastor Ngoy Mulunda has repeatedly refuted the idea that holding
presidential elections on time was impossible. As it stands, the
Congolese people are only three weeks away from casting their ballots.
A central theme in this electoral contest will be a consideration of
Kabila’s tenure and whether the powerful incumbent will allow
campaigning and voting to proceed in a free, fair, and transparent
manner.

This will be only the second presidential election by universal
suffrage since the Congo’s independence from Belgium in 1960. In 2006,
five years after taking power following the assassination of his
father, President Laurent-Désiré Kabila, in early 2001, Joseph Kabila
became president in an electoral process deemed free and fair by the
international community.

Upon taking office Kabila outlined a five-point plan to develop his
country, an African giant that has been plagued by cyclical wars,
rampant plundering, and corruption for much of its history. The five
challenges he planned to tackle during his term in office were
rebuilding the dilapidated national road infrastructure, bringing
accessible healthcare and education to the majority of Congolese,
providing safe housing, establishing functioning water and electricity
delivery systems, and creating job opportunities. His broadly
appealing, if vague, plan aroused many expectations among the
Congolese electorate. But the question remains: With the presidential
contest weeks away, how successful has Kabila’s incumbent government
been in achieving these broad development goals?

Congo’s Paradox

The Congo is endowed with amazing natural resource wealth. It is the
world’s largest cobalt producer, third largest producer of industrial
diamonds, fifth largest producer of copper, and is home to staggering
reserves of uranium, oil, gold, tantalum, tungsten, niobium, and zinc.
Beyond mineral resources, Congo contains vast amounts of other
resources including the continent’s largest rainforests and ample
amount of arable land. Congo’s agriculture sector has the potential to
feed 2 billion people—nearly a third of the world’s
population—according to Jacques Diouf, former general director of the
Food and Agriculture Organization in Congo.[i]

Yet the Congo is a paradox. Despite the country’s wealth in fertile
land and vast mineral reserves, the population continues to suffer.
According to an International Rescue Committee mortality survey in
2007, 5.4 million Congolese have died of treatable diseases.[ii] Poor
water sanitation has made cholera endemic and widespread especially in
urban areas like the capital, Kinshasa. Educational services, like
healthcare, are lacking. Public school teachers frequently go on
strike because of the government’s inability to pay their salaries.
The government is also incapable of implementing the constitutional
provision that mandates free primary and high school education for all
students. Additionally, large swaths of the eastern region are plagued
by violence and continue to be overrun with armed forces.

Kabila himself made a harsh assessment of the progress of his
development plan, stating during his last speech to the nation in
December 2010, “Water and power cuts are people’s daily lot. For 40
years, forests have swallowed 149,000 kilometers of roads Congo
inherited from the Belgians.” He added, “Another Congo is possible
with different politics.”[iii]

Kabila’s Politics – Different in word and deed

But what kind of politics has Kabila brought to the Congo?

Lacking any national constituency of his own when he succeeded his
father in 2001, Kabila relied on support from the international
community to shore up his powerbase. He easily wooed the inhabitants
of the Elysees Palace and the White House on his presidential visits,
due in part to his swift reversal of his father’s policies. His
outward cooperation with Western allies, however, belied drastic steps
taken internally to consolidate his control. Three months after his
swearing in, Kabila dramatically dismissed his entire cabinet,
including allies who supported his ascension to the presidency in the
wake of his father’s assassination. In their place he appointed young
Congolese technocrats. In reality, however, the country was ruled by
Kabila and his small coterie of confidantes, the most remarkable of
which, Augustin Katumba Mwanke, is known in diplomatic circles as the
“Dick Cheney of the Congo.” Under Kabila, Mwanke was given control of
Congolese state assets including major diamond and copper concessions,
steel mills, coffee plantations, and the national water and
electricity companies. He was named by the U.N. Group of Experts as a
key player in the continued plunder of the Congo’s resources.

Despite the pervasive exploitation of the Congo’s public assets,
Kabila was praised for his ability to unify many competing political
factions. Even though his power-sharing approach required rampant
patronage and corruption, his reward for increased stability was a
victory with 58 percent of the national vote in the 2006 election. He
rhetorically connected the Congo’s tenuous peace to his successful
election. In the war-ravaged east, Kabila was elected largely on his
promises to bring an end to conflict in the region.

However, sustainable peace cannot come from promises alone. Meaningful
human security, civilian protection, and state autonomy depend
primarily on security sector reform. In the Congo this requires
genuine disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration of irregular
forces, the professionalization of the military, including
establishment of military academies and systematic training,
construction of adequate barracks, provision of proper clothing and
equipment, and regular pay. Without these elements, armed forces in
the east will not end their predation on the civilian population. Yet,
for all of Kabila’s years in power, and in spite of millions in donor
aid supporting Congolese security sector reform, the various makeshift
programs to integrate armed groups have largely failed. The Congolese
military and irregular forces retain a perverse web of alliances and
prevent a lasting peace in the east.

Kabila’s Electoral Calculus

It seems Kabila has recognized the shortcomings of his administration
and has moved to leverage his considerable political influence in the
upcoming elections. As noted in the blog post, “Controversial
Constitution Review a Bellwether for More Disarray in Congo?”[iv]
Kabila’s controversial move to unilaterally alter the constitution
marked the start of a tumultuous period in Congolese politics. His
revisions have scrapped a multi-round run-off system in favor of one
round of voting—potentially resulting in a president elected without a
majority of votes. Kabila’s move was one of political expediency.
After years of consuming the country’s assets while providing almost
nothing to the people in return, his national image has been severely
undermined. Under the old system this decline in popularity, along
with significant defections of former allies to the opposition, left
him with grim prospects of re-election. However, without a run-off
system he may well be able to eke out a win by earning a plurality of
votes. According to former North Kivu civil society chairman Jason
Luneno, now opposition candidate Vital Kamerhe’s campaign manager for
the province, the president’s coalition has requisitioned the entire
Congolese air fleet in a bid to obstruct his challengers’ ability to
ship their campaign materials throughout the country.

Beyond electoral maneuvering, officers in the various militias and
army regiments active in eastern Congo have expressed during
interviews with Enough their willingness to use force to keep Kabila
in power if the elections do not go in his favor. Like in the case of
now-deposed Ivorian President Laurent Gbagbo, the whispers of armed
opposition to electoral results pervade the regions of the east. It is
possible, regardless of the result, that the elections will stoke the
embers of conflict in the country.

In all cases, given the current fragility of the political situation,
post-electoral turmoil may seem unavoidable. The U.S. government,
international community, and human rights groups have a duty to keep
pressing for fair and transparent presidential elections. They must
call on CENI and the Independent Broadcasting Authority to act
impartially towards all parties and to allow opposition to share fully
in the election processing centers. They must demand that all
presidential contenders accept the election results without violence
or incident. The work of MONUSCO in supporting and monitoring the
process and in protecting civilians at a potentially volatile moment
will also be vital to a successful election. Importantly, Kabila
should welcome the elections as the legitimate voice of the Congolese
people and allow the vote to proceed in a peaceful and transparent
manner, regardless of the potential outcome.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to