Have you seen the irony: Sudan now directs the UNSC?

By Zechariah Manyok Biar, JUBA, RSS

MAY 12/2012, SSN; It is not easy to pretend for long time to be a
law-abiding person when you are used to law-breaking. Less than a
month ago, the Sudanese Government complained to the United Nations
Security Council (UNSC), accusing South Sudan of being a law-breaker
against a “law-abiding Sudan.” In its complaints, Sudan wanted the
UNSC’s action against South Sudan for “breaking” international law.

In their response to Sudan’s complaints, the UNSC members and other
international community screamed on top of their voices, using every
phrase they could get to condemn the “aggressive behavior” of South
Sudan. They threatened us with sanctions if we could not withdraw from
Heglig.

We knelt down and begged the international community to hear our side
of the story, telling them that we were more law-abiding than the
Sudan. We were just acting in self-defense. But nobody listened.

We gave in and said we should prove the international community wrong
by putting the Sudan to test. We withdrew from both Heglig and Abyei
in compliance with the international community’s call for withdrawal
from those areas.

Now it was the turn of the Sudan Government to prove itself as
law-abiding before the international community. The UNSC passed a
resolution under Chapter VII. As part of this resolution, both South
Sudan and Sudan were ordered to withdraw from Abyei immediately. They
were also threatened with sanctions if they never ceased fire within
48 hours and go back to the negotiating table within two weeks.

South Sudanese Government responded with a big “yes sir”, but the
Sudanese showed that they knew how to reason better than the
international community.

First, they argued that the African Union was wrong to involve the
United Nations in the process of the AU’s roadmap endorsement.

Second, they selected provisions that favored them in the UNSC
resolution and called them positive, but provisions that never favored
them were branded wrongly worded and considered for review by the
Sudan Government.

The issue of cease fire was seen as the obligation of South Sudan
alone. Sudan considered itself permitted under self defense to keep
bombing South Sudan. Not only that, the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF)
remained in Abyei even when South Sudan had completely withdrawn its
police forces from the area.

When the bombing of South Sudan became boring to SAF, they spiced
things up by attacking Kafindibei and Kafia Kingi on Monday this week
and boasted about capturing them. They know that if SPLA retaliates,
the international community will impose sanction on South Sudan for
violating the cease fire that came into effect less than a week ago.

That was not the whole thing, on Wednesday this week the Sudanese
Parliament seemed to have remembered that they had forgotten to tell
the UNSC what to include in the resolution and what not to include.

They found that the UNSC had overstepped its mandate by asking Sudan
to talk to rebels in Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile. As a result, it
was rejected by the Parliament.

Although Sudan is enjoying telling the UNSC what to do and what not to
do, South Sudan does not seem to have any choice on who to stay in the
disputed areas.

The Sudanese seem to believe that it is the unquestionable right of
the Sudanese to stay in the disputed areas until the solution is
found. It does not matter who stayed in what disputed area before the
UNSC resolution.

The irony is this: the UNSC that Sudan considered as its boss less
than a month ago when South Sudan captured Heglig (Panthou) has now
become the child that Sudan must direct. Have you seen this? That is
the Country South Sudan is dealing with.

By complying with all the UNSC demands, we in South Sudan thought we
were putting Sudan to real test to prove before the international
community that it was more law-abiding than South Sudan is.

But now it is becoming clear that Sudan is the one putting the UNSC
and the rest of the international community to real test, and it is
succeeding.

I think the UNSC will have no choice but to join us in keeping silent
when the big man of Sudan talks. We should listen to him. Otherwise,
we are all in trouble.

Zechariah Manyok Biar lives in Juba, Republic of South Sudan. He can
be reached at [email protected]

COMMENTS:

Pres. Kiir unpopular in the West Mr. Biar, I like the way you write
(Have you seen the irony...): precisely, with economic use of words.
This has stimulated me to respond to your article on UNSC action. An
Ethiopian saying goes thus: If you are hated by many in a community,
even a cold potato can burn you. I think there is some fatigue among
members of the international community towards the South and so we are
no longer the darling of the West which some of us thought we were.
>From where I sit, I have come with few reasons why this is so. I may
be wrong. Let me begin with the most trivial one.

1. The Westerners, particularly the American, are not attracted to
those who are not charming. That is why, a recent study has shown that
an attractive fellow can get away with murder because, his/her charm
brings out sense of forgiveness in those attracted to them. I met some
Americans in the recent past. They told me that our President
is...errr... not popular in the US. I asked: Why? They answered:
Because of his cowboy hat and beard! Beard in the US is associated
with Fidel Castro of Cuba who is a bogey man in the US. I guess our
President have very few admirers among the intelligentsia in the West
This means, very few people who matter care to run to our rescue, when
in trouble, solely on personal chemistry of the Big man. I leave it to
the presidential Aides whether there is a room for improvement here so
that out president can charm his way into the heart of the West (This
is not to say that Omer Beshir is more charming, far from it!!).

2. The West, again, do not want to be associated with a brazen
practitioner of corruption (the keyword is brazen). The fact that our
President casually instruct the Minister of Finance to write a cheque
of USD 30m just like that without due process is deeply offensive to
those in the West (Remember Amum and Chol court case?). In addition,
there has been several other rumors of corrupt practices in the young
nation. Thus, president Kiir is seen as a Chief Priest overseeing this
bad practices. Hence, the feeling might be that the sooner he vacates
the office the better. This can be brought about by the ongoing crises
if need be. So, we are alone when it comes to show of love in the
UNSC!

3. The SPLM/A are taxing the patient of the people in the West by
continuing to behave as rebels and spoilt brats. During the war, many
people in the West were ready to forgive the mistakes of the army.
They (SPLM/A) did not have responsibility of a sovereign nation. But
now, the South continues to insult senior members of international
organizations who actually are walking with us through the
difficulties we are experiencing now. This has further alienated our
friends in the World, hence, we seem to have no Godfather at the UN.
In contrast, Bashir depends on countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia
on whom the West depends when it comes to the Israeli-Arab conflict.
Remember, if you thought we are the darling of the West because of
oil, sorry, we are not the only oil producing in central Africa any
longer: Kenya, Uganda and may be DRC are now members. So let us stop
behaving like Syria (Golan Heights owners) and Beshir at the UN. They
are not as diplomatic orphans as we are!

In conclusion, let us learn how the UN works slowly but surely, and at
the same time, making friends and maybe get a Godfather as well. So
those guys who have the ears of the Big Man (John Luk, Ambrose Ring
Thiik, Tellar Deng and others) and who also know the West well, should
whisper something during the famous Red Label tasting session to our
prezzo. It might work!! Jas Buruk, RSS

COMMENTS, PLEASE CLICK HERE

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the
author(s) and do not represent those of the website.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to