Have the Tripartite Partners Secured Humanitarian Relief for South
Kordofan and Blue Nile?





Recently, the government of Sudan and the Sudan People’s Liberation
Movement-North, or SPLM-N, signed separate memoranda of understanding,
or MOUs, with the so-called “Tripartite Partners” comprised of the
United Nations, the African Union, and the League of Arab States.
While challenges remain, the MOUs are a positive step forward in
securing unfettered access for international humanitarian aid
organizations to conflict-affected populations in South Kordofan and
Blue Nile.

 By Jenn Christian | Aug 15, 2012


Recently, the government of Sudan and the Sudan People’s Liberation
Movement-North, or SPLM-N, signed separate memoranda of understanding,
or MOUs, with the so-called “Tripartite Partners” comprised of the
United Nations, the African Union, and the League of Arab States.
While challenges remain, the MOUs are a positive step forward in
securing unfettered access for international humanitarian aid
organizations to conflict-affected populations in South Kordofan and
Blue Nile. According to the U.N.’s estimates, the affected population
numbers over 700,000. The vast majority of these people have been
sealed off from international humanitarian assistance since at least
September 2011. Notably, there are discrepancies between the texts of
the two MOUs. These differences, coupled with the continued lack of a
ceasefire agreement between the government and all militarily active
components of the Sudan Revolutionary Front, or SRF, call into
question the efficacy of the two MOUs. These two caveats temper the
degree to which the two MOUs will be effective in creating an
environment in which the Tripartite Partners and their affiliated
organization will be able to adequately deliver aid to
conflict-affected populations, particularly those in SPLM-N-controlled
areas.

Given the ambiguities that remain in the agreements’ texts, the Enough
Project recommends that the Tripartite Partners, backed by other
international actors, closely monitor the implementation of the two
agreements. In particular, the international community should exert
pressure to ensure that the government of Sudan permits independent,
third-party humanitarian access into the two states. As well,
assessment teams compromised of representatives of the Tripartite
Partners should be deployed no later than August 18, 2012 to all
conflict-affected areas. Finally, pressure should be applied on both
parties to maintain a cessation of hostilities in all
conflict-affected areas—not just those areas where humanitarian
operations are taking place—and to press the government of Sudan to
negotiate a comprehensive ceasefire agreement with the SPLM-N and the
other militarily active components of the SRF.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to