Taking Conflict Out of Our Gadgets: Which Companies Are Doing Best?



Posted by Laura Heaton on Aug 16, 2012








Two years since a U.S. law put the spotlight on the issue of conflict
minerals from eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, which American
electronics companies are making strides to clean up their supply
chains and which are lagging behind—or doing nothing at all?

A new report published today by the Enough Project assesses the
efforts of the 24 largest consumer electronics companies and ranks
them in order. At the top: Intel, HP, Motorola Solutions, and Apple,
all of which have taken significant steps to trace and audit their
supply chains, as well as support industry-wide certification efforts.
At the other end of the spectrum: Canon, Nikon, Sharp, and HTC have
made little progress to address conflict minerals in their supply
chains, achieving less than 10 percent of the 100 possible points of
Enough’s criteria. Notably, Nintendo ranks at the very bottom of the
list, having failed to make any known effort to trace or audit its
supply chain, despite growing public awareness.

This is the second time that Enough has ranked electronics companies
according to their progress to address the use of Congo’s conflict
minerals in their supply chains. Enough issued its first company
rankings in 2010, and today’s report builds on those findings,
comparing each company’s current effort to its previous score, when
available.

Spurred by the increased attention from the conflict minerals
provision of the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill and by consumer
activism, the 2012 rankings show an overall trend of improvement among
electronics companies to invest in a conflict-free mining sector in
eastern Congo. However, other industries, including jewelry,
automotive, and industrial machinery have made less progress.

"Much of the progress that has been made by electronics companies on
conflict minerals can be attributed to direct consumer action," said
report co-author and Enough Project Student Coordinator Alexandra
Hellmuth in a press release. "We are witnessing a mass consumer
movement for the creation of a clean minerals sector in Congo. Not
surprisingly, college students have emerged as the leading activists
on this issue. Students from more than 100 college campuses across the
U.S. and U.K. are advocating for their university's purchasing and
investment policies to reflect company action on conflict minerals."

As part of the rollout of today’s company rankings report, Enough also
released a new video featuring actor and ethical mining entrepreneur
Jeffrey Wright of “Angels in America,” and “Basquiat,” and the James
Bond franchise fame.

Wright and Enough Executive Director John C. Bradshaw also co-wrote an
oped featured today on the Huffington Post’s homepage to announce the
release of the rankings. The report package also includes a new
slideshow of photographs from Enough’s researchers in the field. The
rankings are designed to help provide consumers with information to
make responsible and informed purchasing choices, and to give them the
opportunity to demonstrate to companies why conflict-free from Congo
is important.

The report comes just days before the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission is expected to vote on the final rules on reporting
requirements for U.S. companies potentially dealing in conflict
minerals. “The SEC should ensure that retailers and all firms that use
the minerals are covered by the rules and that there is not a long
phase-in period,” said Sasha Lezhnev, report co-author and Enough
Project Senior Policy Analyst. “Otherwise, the Intels and HPs will be
left unfairly holding the bag for a problem that belongs to thousands
of companies that have been turning a blind eye to this problem for
years.” The vote is slated for August 22.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to