South Sudan accuses Sudan of still using dissidents to fight “proxy war”

Article
Comments (4)

Email
Print
Save

________________________________

April 16,2013 (JUBA) - South Sudan said on Tuesday that increasing
internal political tensions and armed confrontation with dissidents in
its troubled state of Jonglei are activities of a “proxy war”,
allegedly employed by the government of neighbouring Sudan to
destabilise the country.

Juba made the accusation just days after Sudanese president Omer
al-Bashir, accompanied by high-level government officials, paid his
first official visit to the new nation since it gained independence in
July 2011.

Bashir was among a number of officials, including his South Sudanese
counterpart, Salva Kiir, who pledged to work together to implement a
cooperation agreement signed by both countries last September.

“We will not go back to war. President Kiir and I agreed that the war
was too long”, Bashir told journalists at a joint press conference on
12 April, adding that his visit was aimed at building stronger
relations and deepening the connections still shared between the two
countries.

“I came to Juba because we now have the biggest chance to make peace,” he said.

However, South Sudan’s minister of information, Barnaba Marial, said
his country continued to face significant challenges, including
“effusive complicated security threats”, despite commitments from its
northern neighbour to maintain close and friendly bilateral
cooperation.

“There are some countries which are working to undermine stability of
this country. They are working with people who are causing insecurity
and killing innocent civilians in [a] senseless conflict. These
countries are expanding their military presence in some parts of the
country and are frequently making the situation tenser”, Marial told
reporters in an apparent reference to Sudan

Such moves, he said, clearly violate international norms and
principles relating to sovereignty and territorial integrity of an
independent state.

The official government spokesperson also stressed that South Sudan
continued to work together with its allies and friends to consolidate
efforts aimed at beefing up security measures to mitigate the threat
of rebel groups.

“Dissidents colluding with [a] foreign force to fight [a] proxy war
have intensified their strategy to undermine stability by wreaking
havoc. They have employed every possible means to contain and control
our country’s development and stability”, Marial said.

The minister was reacting to a statement made in Juba last week in
which Bashir denies his government is providing support to rebels
fighting the Southern government.
The South Sudanese army (SPLA) has been fighting David Yau Yau’s rebel
group in Jonglei state since 2010 after he lost his bid to become an
MP for the Gumruk area in Pibor county.

He briefly rejoined the government in 2011 after accepting an amnesty
extended by Kiir, but restarted his rebellion last year.

"We have lot of evidence that he [Bashir] has been supporting Yau Yau.
There is no doubt about that. It has been proved by independent
international bodies including the United Nations and the Small Arms
Survey. You see, now the support which the government of Sudan gives
some militias and renegades in order destabilise this country is no
longer a claim", he said.

"Maybe if he has now decided to stop that support then we will see as
the time goes along till when we will be convinced in our right time",
the minister added.

Meanwhile, the South Sudanese minister of defence, John Kong Nyuon,
said on Monday that troops from the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) still
remained in areas along the 2,000km disputed oil-rich border, despite
clear stipulations in the implementation matrix of September’s
cooperation agreement to pull back.

"We have notified the United Nations Interim Force for Abyei (UNISFA),
which was given the responsibility to verify and report to the
relevant authorities, including the African Union (AU) and the [UN]
Security Council (UNSC) whether the two sides have fully withdrawn
their forces from the designated buffer zones, of the presence of the
Sudan Armed Forces from the area which they were expected to have
withdrawn their troops", Nyuon said.

Nyuon made the remarks at a meeting with border community members in
Juba on Monday, during which he said his country had completed what
was required by the agreement, despite the SAF’s refusal to comply.

The top defence official accused the Sudanese army of “making
trouble”, adding that although it had withdrawn, its troops were still
watching and constantly monitoring military activities on the border.

The dispute over contested and claimed areas - specifically the
oil-processing town of Panthou, which Sudan calls Heglig, brought the
two countries to the brink of war when the SPLA temporarily took
control of the area in April 2012, generating international
condemnation, as well as calls for the immediate and unconditional
withdrawal of troops and the resumption of talks.

Northern and Western Bahr el Ghazal, as well as Unity and Upper Nile
states in South Sudan all contain areas claimed by both nations. In
order to diffuse tensions the two sides agreed in September to
establish a Safe Demilitarised Border Zone (SDBZ) and pull their
troops 10km back from a notional border line put forward by the AU
mediation team.

The most contentious area remains Abyei, where a referendum had been
scheduled to decide whether it would remain in Sudan or join the newly
independent South. However, disagreement over who would be allowed to
vote has delayed the poll for over two years.

The AU panel mediating between the two sides has suggested that the
vote goes ahead in October but Sudan says the issue of voting rights
is still to be resolved.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to