Singing in the sinking ship: Our failed presidency
Jun. 06 Featured, Uncategorized 4 comments      

BY: Marial Mach Aduot, Australia, JUN/06/2013, SSN;

>From the madness in Lakes State, security impasse in Jonglei, to the
delusional politics in Juba, South Sudan is a country on a mega-phone
shout “May-day! May-day!” Reasons for this cataclysm are attributed to
the country’s president that has chosen to rule the state in perpetual
carelessness while residing in alternate universe characterised by the
fear of accountability.

(Corps-tion), corruption rather and resistance to change became
literally ingrained into state’s political arrangement due to Mr.
Ciir-Kiir’s inability to provide critical calls and decisions when
needed. I am pleading to the apostles of (No to Change) who imply
President Kiir’s mediocrity as the best way forward to please tell him
that it isn’t saving any ordinary South Sudanese, but your gangs.

The notion of ‘let’s grab what is meant for public uplifting for our
own use’ is hurting the nation and the reputation of the ruling party
who wages the war to bring prosperity and justice to the people who
were peripheral in tyrannical state of Sudan.

Seeing the president, vice and many other senior government’s
officials talking of the change they never provide or dream of
creating is simply an epitome of hypocrisy from the ship captain and
many of his co-skippers that have lost the navigation system.

Despite the current exchange of blames between the president and his
vice on who mis-steers the ship and who gives the wrong directions, I
would term such open criticism as the result of an abysmal, or
immeasurably deep failure from the men who perhaps should not lead the
country in the first place.

Unlike others who pre-emptively concluded that Dr. Riek will be an
alternative or Kiir’s still the right man for the job, my thoughts
would be a little different as I will not be drawn into an
endorsement. The failure of presidency to reach or to work
consensually on the issues facing the nation, makes the president and
his vice in my opinion, as a total wreck, although Dr. Machar has
benefited of the doubt.

When it came to who mishandled the state, I believe Salva Kiir has
done it, and he doesn’t deserve another term as the president.

Dr. Machar, when it came to why corrupt officials are not arrested or
investigated is a minor player in my opinion. The insinuation of
“Vice” means he would be in breach of his constitutional mandate
should he have decided to order an arrest of top political or military
figures implicated in the disappearing of four billion dollars that
have wrecked the country’s economy.

This does not mean the vice president is exempted from government’s
shortcoming nor is it an endorsement to dethrone the president, but he
can face little criticism on the issues of governance unlike Salva,
should the former leader of Nasir Faction raises his hand for the
presidency.

With the tonality I use in this piece, I assume that it will not go
down well with masses who want to see the president retain his seat
and those who see his deputy as the alternative choice to rescue the
country from political and economic crisis, and even from those who
categorize who’s worth for the leadership on the merit of true hero
and not so true hero.

Believe it or not, all these assumptions are attributed to the quest
of leadership and will appear during the SPLM’s leadership contest
should there be one.

But as the history shaped the future, the questions of who did what
during the war will have a place in our political history, but
allowing them to determine the future will lead to political and
social catastrophes capable of ruining what we have achieved or can
achieve.

It’s time to refocus and start to look at the potentials rather than
an endogenous tribal driven leadership or endorsements. Many people in
South Sudan, especially the youth want to see this happening and the
search for answers on how to make this dream a reality have led to
multiple brainstorming.

One group suggests the destruction of SPLM and other groups like David
Yau-Yau seek to overthrow the entire government. All these groups have
an argument to make, but I disagreed in the past and still not
convinced with their analysis.

SPLM destructions can’t turn South Sudan into a paradise overnight,
nor will overthrowing it help the situation either. The viable option
is political franchise free from the fear of reprisal.

Apart from stopping the rhetoric used by late Athor Deng Dut and David
Yau-Yau, open democracy will inject overwhelming new blood into the
current toxic politics and will extinguish the rapidly growing
political suppression by the ruling elites.

Whoever will emerge victorious will be bestowed with the people’s
mandate and new governing styles and will also emphasise
accountability and hoist the responsibility as well as the service
delivery mindsets.

Marial Mach Aduot Mach is a South Sudanese residing in Melbourne,
Australia. He can be reached for comments at [email protected].
<< Older
Newer >>
4 Comments

    Aguer Achuil Rual Bol
    June 7, 2013 at 5:09 am     

    Why pple always die and the death was caused by David Yau Yau?
While the other death was by tribal conflict, now president doesn’t
see that?
    Reply       
    wanilosake
    June 7, 2013 at 5:35 am     

    who are you working for? patriotism?
    what example you will show to your kids about patriotism?
    how the presidency had failed?
    you got freedom you never fought for yet you are not satisfied.
    Reply       
    James Lual Garang
    June 7, 2013 at 12:57 pm    

    This is a good piece, Salva Kiir should be seen as a sole failure
but not weighing people from Bahr el Ghazal. There are potential
leaders in this region who can do far much better than Mr. president
if given a chance.
    Reply       
    DEng-ajith Duot
    June 7, 2013 at 5:28 pm     

    You have mention few important points in relation to our current
state affairs. Let’s wait and see what the general public would think
about the two men.
    SPLM party must think critical on who is going to lead their party
instead of Kiir or Dr. Riek.

    To me both men have failed our country in the last 8 years they
have been in power.

    Thanks,
    DEng-ajith Duot

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oqNT418seyjtjt0J4mNxyZLFReWf4kY6KMvJVYTDv%3D6gw%40mail.gmail.com?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to