Congo: is this the end of the world’s worst war? – By Richard Dowden
Posted on November 12,
2013<http://africanarguments.org/2013/11/12/congo-is-this-the-end-of-the-worlds-worst-war-by-richard-dowden/>by
AfricanArgumentsEditor<http://africanarguments.org/author/africanargumentseditor/>

It may be just a pause but the recent defeat of M23 in Eastern Congo could
mark the end of the world’s worst and longest-running war. No one will ever
know how many people were killed directly or died of preventable diseases
as a result. The frequently-quoted death toll up to 2007 is 5.4 million.
But that, as Stalin said, is just a statistic. No one knows and no one can
fathom the pain and loss that this war has cost. We will only ever know a
tiny fraction of it from survivors.

There were no big decisive battles, just attacks which killed a few, raped
millions of women and drove many from their homes and farms and into the
forests or camps where they died of hunger and disease. It was not
important for the big powers of the world and generally too complicated and
too far away for the world’s press.

The Kivus, north and south, are one of the most densely populated parts of
rural Africa, home to many ethnicities. Communities of Tutsi cattle keepers
settled there, some of them exiled from Rwanda after the 1959 genocide and
others migrating there or were brought by the Belgians, who saw the Tutsis
as a superior race to the local Africans and used them as policemen and
administrators. Successive uprisings and killings in Rwanda and Burundi
sent more Tutsis across their borders into eastern Congo. This is well
explained in Michael Deibert’s excellent new
book<http://africanarguments.org/the-democratic-republic-of-congo-between-hope-and-despair/>in
our *African
Arguments* series: ‘The Democratic Republic of Congo Between Hope And
Despair.’

I went to the region in January 1994, just before the genocide in Rwanda,
to try to understand the complexities of the nasty little war between the
Tutsis and the local Bahunde and Nande people. I had a long conversation
with an expert on the region and its peoples. A group of journalists,
uneasy with the usual cliches about Africa, “ancient tribal hatreds”,
“chaos” and “tribal land wars”, had decided to try to dig a little deeper.
We banned the words chaos and tribalism. The causes of conflicts should be
made clear just as they would be anywhere else in the world. I spent
several hours with the expert trying to understand the historical
grievances and disputes of the region, the role of colonial rule and the
present administration. The expert talked on and on. I made pages of notes
and still had more questions. In the end he paused and said with a sigh:
“If I were you I would just call it chaos”.

A peace conference was in progress in a small school the two sides were not
making much progress. I remember a Bahunde chief saying that they were not
against the Tutsis, but they were foreigners and should behave like
foreigners. These Tutsis, he explained, were beginning to marry local
girls, buy land and start businesses. They were taking over. But it was far
more complicated than that. So complicated, that no one has been able to
stop the wars since – 19 years later.

I did however discover one major cause. While I was staying in Bunia, the
main town in the area, a large white cargo plane flew in. The Belgian crew
came to the hotel I was staying at and I got chatting to them. They had
come for the monthly gold collection. The area is rich in gold dug by local
panners and sold to local dealers. The pilot told me that once the plane
was loaded they flew from Bunia to Gdabdolite, Mobutu’s village and
headquarters, where it was checked before flying on to Switzerland to be
deposited in his personal bullion store. The government of Zaire – as Congo
was called then – never saw a cent of it.

Eastern Congo is potentially one of the wealthiest places on earth. The
rich soil and warm wet climate enable crops to grow all year round, the
forests are full of valuable timber and below ground the rocks are veined
with gold and coltan, the latter a key component of mobile phones. Anyone
who controlled land could become seriously wealthy. In contrast, Rwanda has
very little mineral wealth and its soils are exhausted. After the genocide
in 1994 the armies of Rwanda and Uganda invaded Congo in pursuit of the
remnant of the previous genocidal Rwandan army. There they discovered the
wealth that lay beneath the Kivu’s soil and it started heading east across
the borders. Rwanda and Uganda called it ‘war reparations’ for a while, but
then the generals of both countries found reasons to stay on long after
Rwanda’s genocidaires could pose any threat. In Uganda’s case the generals
kept the loot for themselves and their president. In Rwanda most of it went
to the state.

It was only a few years ago that the UN, at the request of Congo,
investigate just how much was being looted from eastern Congo. The Rwandans
counted on the American military to support them but the substance of the
report was verified from other sources. The Rwandans were forced to
withdraw but supplied a series of local proxies to continue their resource
grab, of which M23 was the most recent.

Significantly, it has been pressure from the US, and in particular from the
military, where the Rwandans have cultivated many contacts and friends,
that has forced Rwanda to stop supporting M23 and stay out. The US even
supplied drones to the UN force to patrol the porous border. At the same
time the UN peacekeepers have been given a stronger mandate and the
training and weapons to go on the offensive. So has the Congolese army,
which for years has acted more like just another gang of looters and
rapists. Their coordinated attacks on M23 have defeated it.

Will this be a lull in the 20 year cycle of murder, rape and looting or is
it the beginning of a new peace? That depends on whether the Congolese
soldiers are properly paid (officers still regularly stole the payrolls of
the soldiers), that they remain motivated and the UN force maintains the
momentum and gains the confidence of the local people. It may be that
Eastern Congo’s resources can be exported more cheaply if they flow
eastwards to Kampala and Kigali rather than westwards to Kinshasa but this
should be done in cooperation with the Congolese state which should receive
proper payment and taxes.

Next year will be the 20th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide. It will be
a profoundly moving moment for Rwanda, Africa and the entire world. There
will be recognition that the rest of the world did nothing to stop the
genocide and positive recognition that Rwanda and Burundi (which suffered
similar but less publicised massacres the previous year) have not suffered
a repetition. The recollection will end on a less positive note however if
there is evidence of an ongoing reverse genocide in Congo.


If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a
comment<http://africanarguments.org/2013/11/12/congo-is-this-the-end-of-the-worlds-worst-war-by-richard-dowden/#comments>or
subscribing
to the RSS feed <http://africanarguments.org/feed/> to have future articles
delivered to your feed reader.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14op%2Bss8oZiszKieXsgP5rWjgCnhe_P9RWVdG4jqWKfpkXg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to