Was Abdullah Deng Nhial a victim of hostility or favoritism by the
president?
 Nov. 27 Featured <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/featured/>,
Uncategorized <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/uncategorized/> 9
comments<http://www.southsudannation.com/was-abdullah-deng-nhial-a-victim-of-hostility-or-favoritism-by-the-president/#comments>

By: Justin Ambago Ramba, UK, NOV/27/2013, SSN;

….”the MP’s beating has much to do with his tongue and nothing with his
support for Abyei.” What a news I am hearing from Juba! My old friend
sheikh Nhial chose to physically advice an MP and eventually lost his job!
That was a drama!

Even in that volatile environment of Juba, this incident took everyone by
surprise, I am told. Others wondered as to how a politician can revert to
this kind of advice!

On the whole, it might not have been the right thing for Mr. Abdullah D
Nhial to do. However his circumstances should also be taken into
consideration. I happen to know this Sheikh from school days when we
attended universities in Cairo.

He went to the most prestigious Al Azhar Islamic University, while I
attended the Kasr Al Aini Medical School – Cairo University. We both once
served in the historical SOSSA. He was a deputy secretary for students’
Affairs under my chairmanship. Since then I came to know him better.

What I will continue to remember him for is his strong views, opinions,
positions and above all his being confrontational whenever faced by
circumstances that forces him to do so. No wonder it is a typical Muslim
Brotherhood’s trait ……El Kaizan!

He always knew what his political group has and has not. Would rather have
and would rather not have. What they need and what they don’t need. Above
all Abdullah D Nhial knows how, when and where to go for or about these
things.

No wonder at all that in only two years’ time following the independence of
south Sudan from Sudan, Sheikh Abdullah D Nhial, in spite of all odds was
already rubbing shoulders with the former rebels of the SPLM/A and others
who considered his Islamist ideology as a direct opposite to the core
aspirations of the South Sudanese people who did everything to resist
forced Islamisation, Arabicisation, and of course Arabisation.

Sheikh Deng Nhial’s political past was all about serving the Grande Maître
of later days political Islam, Sheikh Hassan Abdullah Turabi in the
realization of the so-called “Great Islamic Civilization Project” referred
to in short as the “Civilization Project” المشروع الحضارى.

There is no any doubt in my mind at any moment that Sheikh Abdullah D.
Nhial is still a strong believer in the ultimate realization of all the
above mentioned three pillars of the Middle Eastern Neo-Colonialism being
directed towards Africa in general and South Sudan in particular.

Nonetheless, it wasn’t at all difficult either for him to become a minister
in Salva Kiir’s ever lean and reformation cabinet. He is also one of a few
people to have been reshuffled in this cabinet from a ministry to another
within a pace of two days.

After sharing my equally strong views with a friend working with the
National Legislative Assembly in Juba about this most unfortunate incidence
and its possible repercussions on the already bad publicity the new country
has in the world media and how I view this outstanding South Sudanese
politician as a man of an outstanding CV, my friend had this to say to me:

“No one can challenge your view on this particular case, It is a deep
rooted habit with them Kaizan. But frankly speaking, I would have done the
same to that MP if I was subjected to the same abuse. How can the MP call
him a pimp?”

I took that to represent a position likely to be held by many others as
well. In South Sudan people do of course value manners, but when it comes
to personal dignity, don’t mess up with them!

In my humble assessment, Mr. Abdullah D. Nhial’s resort to the application
of physical advice was in line with the first steps of the Islamic Sharia
Law known as the “Prompt Justice” العدالة الناجزة! Now and here you settle
the matter.

Otherwise, what did this Warrap MP expected when he was hailing all those
sorts of insults and street words at Sheikh Abdullah D. Nhial, a person
whose physical presence can never be ignored?

Again it can be argued rightly or wrongly that it was the right thing that
the president relieved Abdullah Nhial from the cabinet job following that
showdown and loss of temper.

However given the true sensitivity of the issues involved and the trend
which it took as it unfolded and finally resolved, it will be the unsaid
that will carry the weight of the true situation.

Yet at the end of the day, we are all human beings, prone to make mistakes.
While the minister might have paid the price of his emotional reaction, let
us also hope that our friends from Warrap who put pressure on the president
to grant them their wish, there is also a lesson for them to learn. A rude
word is no any better than a slap on the face!

So how could one really sum up this weird incidence that took many by
surprise? Another equally concerning reaction came in response to the
country’s president who preferred to sack the minister without due
investigation or any disciplinary actions towards the MP in the centre of
this brawl.

In a society like South Sudan where nepotism and tribalism is rife, this
has undoubtedly prompted many to believe that the president was being
partial in this case as this MP hails from the president’s backyard.

This Warrap MP’s beating has nothing to do with his support for Abyei as
Abdullah D Nhial’s dismissal should have nothing to do with what he thinks
of the issue. For if we go by official statements, any views on Abyei
should be seen by president Salva Kiir Mayardit and his entire cabinet as
outside the government’s officially declared position.

Was it not president Kiir who announced that the final solution to Abyei
issues doesn’t lay in Juba anymore? “It is now up to the African Union to
find that solution”. The president reiterated just a month ago.

While the MP from President Kiir’s backyard of Warrap could be right to
show off his comradeship with his kinsmen of Abyei, still he could have
done it in a civilized way. We expect our politicians to debate all kinds
of issues that affect the country in a matured and cultivated manner.

However hurling insults and calling others names is a kind substandard to
say the least.

Again what I fail to understand is that, how comes this particular MP had
all the guts to hurl insults on Abdullah D. Nhial simply for holding a
different view on Abyei, when his own man, the President, is now totally
numb and dumb on the issue.

Was it not also this very president Salva Kiir Mayardit who the people of
Bahr Ghazel are ready to worship, the one which came out openly to tell the
whole world that the unilateral referendum that was held in Abyei, was an
illegal action, hence null and void and to the best of it he has nothing to
do with it?

Was he (President Salva Kiir) not the one who made it unequivocally blunt
that the outcome of that referendum wouldn’t be binding for him? And what
do we say about those Ngok Dinka in their thousands who not only insist to
be Kordofanians, and hence citizens of Sudan as opposed to South Sudan. We
know their leaders by names and who is someone like me to impose on them
what they don’t want?

Fellow South Sudanese, despite my deeply rooted ideological differences
with Sheikh Abdullah D. Nhial, a thing I know can never be rectified
without a huge miracle taking place first; nevertheless today I don’t see
him on the wrong to deserve being insulted in the public and be referred to
as a pimp for saying what he politically thinks is right. This is democracy
for you!

What can any South Sudanese citizen do on the issue of the Abyei disputed
territory any better than the current president of the Republic of South
Sudan, Pres. Salva Kiir Mayardit, and the many Dinka Ngok elites he has
often decorated his foreign missions with? Let alone those previous good
for nothing cabinets!

First, there is Dr. Francis Mading Deng who is now South Sudan’s Permanent
Representative to the United Nations in New York, then Dr. Chol Deng Alak,
South Sudan’s Ambassador to the Russian Federation – the South Sudan
Embassy in Moscow, and Mr. Arop Deng Kuol, the Permanent Representative of
the Republic of South Sudan to the African Union in Addis Ababa..

Today in South Sudan, it is sadly true that we are still what we were in
the Old Sudan. Under Khartoum we were all tribes and religious sects and
denominations. Everyone served lip service to the true Sudanism that
existed only in late Dr. John Garang’s lectures and probably his dreams.

When some of us thought of themselves as Arabs others were Africans,
Muslims or Islamists, Jaalieen, Dinka, Nuer, Junubien, Nuba, Darfuri and
yet others considered themselves the true and only Awlad Balad.

The irony today is that even in an independent South Sudan, unfortunately
we remain far from embracing South Sudanism! Who didn’t know that Abdullah
Deng Nhial was a minister of environment in a hostile environment!

We only know what we are not. And besides our tribes, unfortunately even
after the five decades or so of the brutal wars and struggles,
unfortunately we are still not what we want to be. Maybe it is that we
actually do not know precisely what we want to be!

Author: Dr. Justin Ambago Ramba. Reachable at: [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14orEopNADyd22_Q1j3axZuP%2BfpPVpyfyw3p2WAsu-KCr0A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to