Report on Sudanese troops holding S. African peacekeepers in Darfur
‘hostages’ draws swift denials

   - Article <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55369#tabs-1>
   - Comments (4) <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55369#tabs-2>

[image: email] Email
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=55369>
[image: print] Print
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=55369>
[image: pdf]Save
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=55369&nom_fichier=article_55369>
[image: separation]
[image: increase] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55369#>
[image: decrease] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article55369#>
[image: separation]
[image: separation]

   - [image: Inline image 1]
   
<http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle55369&t=Report%20on%20Sudanese%20troops%20holding%20S.%20African%20peacekeepers%20in%20Darfur%20%E2%80%98hostages%E2%80%99%20draws%20swift%20denials%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan>
   - [image: Inline image 2]
   
<http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle55369&t=Report%20on%20Sudanese%20troops%20holding%20S.%20African%20peacekeepers%20in%20Darfur%20%E2%80%98hostages%E2%80%99%20draws%20swift%20denials%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan>
   - [image: Inline image 4]
   
<http://twitter.com/share?text=Report%20on%20Sudanese%20troops%20holding%20S.%20African%20peacekeepers%20in%20Darfur%20%E2%80%98hostages%E2%80%99%20draws%20swift%20denials%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle55369>
   - [image: Inline image 3]
   
<http://buzz.yahoo.com/submit?submitUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle55369&submitHeadline=Report%20on%20Sudanese%20troops%20holding%20S.%20African%20peacekeepers%20in%20Darfur%20%E2%80%98hostages%E2%80%99%20draws%20swift%20denials%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&submitSummary=%20June%2016%2C%202015%20%28KHARTOUM%29%20%E2%80%93%20The%20Sudanese%20and%20South%20African%20governments%20as%20well%20as%20the%20United%20Nations%20%28UN%29%20strongly%20denied%20a%20report%20alleging%20that%20%28...%29%20>

------------------------------

June 16, 2015 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudanese and South African governments as
well as the United Nations (UN) strongly denied a report alleging that
Khartoum held its peacekeepers in Darfur ‘hostages’ while they ascertain
that president Omer Hassan al-Bashir has arrived safely from the African
Union (AU) summit in Johannesburg.
[image: JPEG - 23.8 kb]*A UNAMID peacekeeper during a routine patrol in
Tawila, North Darfur.(Photo UNAMID/Hamid Abdelsalam)*

Bashir narrowly escaped an arrest order issued by High Court judges in
South Africa in compliance with the International Criminal Court (ICC)
arrest warrants against him for war crimes and genocide allegedly committed
in Darfur.

South Africa refused to execute a court decision issued last Sunday that
ordered Bashir to remain in the country while a case against him is being
reviewed.

After his departure, the government suggested that he left without their
knowledge and vowed to submit an affidavit early next week explaining how
this happened.

On Tuesday, South Africa’s website *News24* quoted unnamed peacekeepers in
Darfur as saying that they were held “hostage” by Sudanese troops when the
drama around Bashir’s possible arrest in Johannesburg.

“We were so scared – we were surrounded by soldiers. We handed out extra
ammunition to all our troops in case they needed it,” said one South
African soldier in Sudan on Tuesday.

“Vehicles approached our bases and the commander placed us on State 2 of
readiness,” said another soldier. This meant all troops had to be in combat
gear, fully armed, and positioned in bunkers and against embankments.

Another soldier said if the situation got out of hand, “we would have had
to surrender to save our lives, because you can’t fight a country’s army
with a poorly equipped battalion”.

“I am so thankful that South Africa did not arrest Bashir. The battalion
commander said after Bashir touched down safely in Khartoum, all the
[Sudanese] troops were withdrawn. The calamity has returned to normal,”
reads a message sent by a soldier in Darfur to his friends in South Africa.

But the South Africa National Defence Force (SANDF) rejected the report
calling it unfounded.

“There is no iota of truth in these allegations. There is equally no
substance to support these allegations. The SANDF did not come under any
threat during this period,” SANDF said in a statement.

“No extra-ordinary operational preparedness was done by the SANDF in view
of the reported situation in South Africa. No additional instructions, with
regard to higher alert levels, were issued. The security situation in
Darfur is calm where our troops are deployed.”

The United Nations also dismissed the report.

"South Africa currently has 802 members of an infantry battalion deployed
in Kutum, Malha and Mellit team sites in North Darfur. We can confirm that
the mission’s South African troops were not held hostage or under any
threat as reported in the media," U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq said in a
statement.

A Sudanese official speaking to *Sudan Tribune* on condition of anonymity
called this report “part of a domestic political battle in South Africa.

“This is the same battle that moved the court proceedings [in South Africa
against Bashir] from the start,” the official added.

The Sudanese foreign ministry spokesperson said in a statement to al-Sudani
newspaper that the information included in the report are “imaginary”
adding that Khartoum has no control over Darfur peacekeeping mission.

But the South African National Defence Union’s (SANDU) Pikkie Greeff told
Eyewitness News (EWN) on Tuesday said this incident had been confirmed by
several sources, some of them soldiers.

“The Sudanese army only withdrew from their position once al-Bashir left
South Africa. This would boil down to blackmail by threatening someone with
war.”

Greef said he has no reason to doubt the reports because they come from the
soldiers.

“We are concerned about the safety of our soldiers because they are there
as peacekeepers and not there for conventional war. Zuma must take a firm
stand on this issue,” he added.

SANDU is the South African trade union for SANDF members.

(ST)

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14ooVx7D%2Bfg63ORHyTjrPWQ9nohKB7dzzTSTBiBK9JUuR7g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to