IGAD–PLUS Juba demilitarization proposal is an occupation under another
name
Aug. 04 National <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/national/>,
Uncategorized <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/uncategorized/> 6
comments
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/#comments>

By: John Bith Aliap – Australia, AUG/04/2015, SSN;

When a country gives up its right to patrol its own borders and defend
itself with its own military, you can call it what you want. It isn’t a
nation state. As the war rages in South Sudan, a countless number of South
Sudanese’ enemies under the banner of “IGAD-PLUS” have been working around
the clock to bring the Rep. of Sudan Sudan to its knees through
trouble-prone peace proposals that seem to depict the rebels led by former
vice president, turned rebel leader Riek Machar as angels.

IGAD–PLUS, a mouth-piece of America in East Africa region has recently
unveiled its grand controversial, insulting, recycled, copy and paste
proposal dubbed as “a Compromised Peace Agreement” in an attempt to
resuscitate Machar’s tribal movement, the SPLM–In–Opposition.

In that ill-thought proposal, Juba, the pride of South Sudanese, will be
demilitarized and named as a Special Arrangement Area (SAA). Foreign forces
from the United Nations will take charge of the security.

However, although the idea of Juba’s demilitarization may sound good to its
architects, many South Sudanese including the author of this article aren’t
willing to climb on Juba’s demilitarization bandwagon.

It is a disingenuous act that seems to tell South Sudanese to give away
their hard-won right of freedom only for one power hungry man [traitor Riek
Machar] to bounce back to power.

It’s alarming to see East African leaders … [Museveni of Uganda excluded]
to float the idea of foreign troops deployment in South Sudanese’ national
capital Juba.

This proposal, if accepted, will give foreign troops a green light to
freely roam in every corner of Juba city including Kiir’s JI presidential
palace.

IGAD–PLUS is extremely clear on its aliens’ troops deployment – “these
troops are meant to stay in Juba as long as they wish and wherever they
want”.

But for South Sudanese who dearly love their nation, the surrendering of
their national sovereignty is unlikely; and those who are attempting to
impose such rotten ideas on them will have their hands cut off.

It must be made absolutely clear that South Sudanese aren’t buying
IGAD–PLUS idea of Juba demilitarization.

America, the evil country on earth, is deeply involved in South Sudan’s
demolition project and it’s working underground hand-in-glove with its East
African allies such as Sudan, the historical enemy of South Sudanese, Kenya
and Ethiopia to topple Kiir-led government.

But Obama’s administration doesn’t know that any foreign-sponsored
government in South Sudan as it’s what’s in Americans minds at the moment,
can’t last for a day.

South Sudanese believe that they themselves have the power to decide what
type of government they want and who can lead it and when.

The deployment of foreign troops in South Sudanese’ national capital, Juba,
currently on IGAD–PLUS lips is an occupation under another name.

Climbing on Juba demilitarization bandwagon is a loss of nerve; and such
loss of nerve raises the question about the commitment of the International
Community and East Africa region to South Sudanese’ freedom.

John Bith Aliap holds two bachelor degrees in Social Work and Social
Planning. He can be reached at [email protected]
<< Older
<http://www.southsudannation.com/the-position-of-jieng-council-of-elders-on-the-igad-plus-proposed-compromise-agreement/>
6 Comments

   1. Joana Adams
   August 4, 2015 at 10:25 pm
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/#comment-1185797>

   John Aliab,

   How can you complain of occupation when you are an occupying army,
   government, people in Jubà? My advice to Kiir, the Infamous Council,
   dinkocrats and Dinko Haram led by Malong is that you should remove the
   plunk from your eyes first.
   But if we want to know the truth, there is nothing wrong with
   re-colonisation of South Sudan. after all, lets face it, South Sudan was
   never colonised by any Western power other than Turkey and Egypt. Only
   Western missionaries came to the South out of compassion and that was from
   1930. That’s why our people remained primitive until this day, even a
   government can butcher its own citizen and sees nothing wrong with it.
   Civilised people don’t resort to force to settle disputes. Iam sure thats
   not what happens in Australia although some of bretherens tried. Actually
   we have failed to grasp the concept of modern governance, so lets humbly
   submit to at leadt 50 years of western colonialism. It will do us a lot of
   good, just as it has done to South Sudanese diasporans in East Africa,
   Europe, USA, Canada and Australia.

   Joana
   Reply
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/?replytocom=1185797#respond>
   2. bismark
   August 5, 2015 at 12:44 am
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/#comment-1185903>

   Mr John Bith Aliap,

   It is not a surprise to read your article that articulates your concerns
   on demilitarizing of Juba by foreign forces and subsequent loss of our
   national sovereignty. However we should not rule out that our weakness in
   ruling the country brought us to this political mile stone. What has our
   government done to cement the unity of various ethnic groups of people in
   our country? What have we as a people done to root out insecurity all over
   the country even here in Juba? Why have allowed massacre to take place all
   over the country with ethnic cleansing tone ? Today Jieng Council of
   Elders, a sectarian organisation voices support to one of their own in
   power. What is our parliamentarians doing and where are they? Where is
   democracy? As a government we have institutionalised tribalism, nepotism
   and corruption in all sectors of government, with this what does our
   government expect in return? Resentment!! The sober world can not stand by
   while innocent people are stripped off of their rights and innocently
   killed for standing for their rights. Those people who are committing the
   evil South Sudan is going through will have to answer. As a step the world
   is proposing a suitable plan to establish an environment where they can
   work unhindered by the devils in Juba. Let them do so that security, sanity
   and development can come to our poor people.
   Reply
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/?replytocom=1185903#respond>
   3. martin L.
   August 5, 2015 at 3:59 am
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/#comment-1185992>

   @ John:

   This article is hypocritical! You see, there are multiple foreign troops
   in RSS. To begin with, there are Ugandan People’s Defense Forces ( known as
   UPDF) in Bor town, Bentiu, Malakal and Juba. Additionally, there are UN
   peacekeepers all over south Sudan! The claim that setting Juba as
   demilitarized area amounts to an occupation doesn’t hold water! It is the
   same lie Jieng Council of Elders and Kiir’s government are working hard to
   spread.
   Reply
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/?replytocom=1185992#respond>
   4. Dr Andy
   August 5, 2015 at 5:45 am
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/#comment-1186037>

   Dear All,
   What do you think if the Capital is moved to Ramciel with the proposed
   presidential guards, That could be suggested to IGAD Plus to move the
   Capital to Ramciel during tha TGONU period and work from there with the
   proposed guards and the forces for protection and let us see whether they
   will as well refuse that. During the three years then Ramciel will begin to
   come up as reformation in all institution is taking place. Please, let us
   try to move to Ramciel with or without army and the Police. We may even
   suggest that we do need to go without army but only to maintain a small
   force to control our borders especially that with Sudan only.
   Reply
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/?replytocom=1186037#respond>
   5. Elhag Paul
   August 5, 2015 at 7:04 am
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/#comment-1186071>

   The last time I checked Juba is protected by a foreign force called
   UPDF. So why rant against the IGAD-Plus proposed compromise peace
   agreement. Demilitarisation of Juba and other towns will be highly welcome
   by any reasonable person. I strongly support the endorsement of this
   agreement. The other 62 tribes should support the proposal and encourage
   Riek to sign it without delay.
   Reply
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/?replytocom=1186071#respond>
   6. Lokoronyo
   August 5, 2015 at 8:42 am
   
<http://www.southsudannation.com/igad-plus-juba-demilitarization-proposal-is-an-occupation-under-another-name/#comment-1186116>

   The idea to demilitarize Juba just goes back to why this war started in
   the first place in what the author refers to as the capital city of south
   Sudan and the pride of the nation. The international body, IGAD plus many
   peace loving south Sudanese are very much concerned about the nature,
   composition and the behavior of these supposedly South Sudanese national
   army specially in the capital where all the policies are initiated. The
   events of 15th December 2013 have proved that the current army is unfit not
   only in Juba but in the entire nation to cover during the interim period.
   They don’t have any national quality but tribal or partisan ones that is
   why the country is at war. No any outsider had thought of coming to rescue
   the people in south Sudan had it not been because of the barbaric behavior
   of this army supported in the media by Tribalist individuals like the
   authors of these article. Peace will NEVER come to south Sudan as long as
   we still have intellectuals that think like this article writer and
   mobilizing people to demonstrate against peace in preference for war. God
   have mercy on us from the hands of these men that think and act tribally in
   our nation as shown in the protest that was carried out in Lakes state,
   Aweil , Wau and Juba yesterday

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oqFsDyTxMf_kwbzovdE9veJ6R_%2BTXZ6jPvCM3hhRNDs%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to