---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: IRIN <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:06 AM
Subject: Your daily selection of IRIN Africa English reports, 1/29/2016
To: Elisabeth Janaina <[email protected]>


 [image: IRINnews logo] <http://www.irinnews.org/>
humanitarian news and analysis

Table of contents
1. IRIN's Top Picks: Integrating refugees, auditing Afghanistan, and Zika
<#-1472435286_1>
2. Burundi - nobody to the rescue? <#-1472435286_2>
------------------------------
*IRIN's Top Picks: Integrating refugees, auditing Afghanistan, and Zika
<http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=102397>*

[image: lead photo]GENEVA, 29 January 2016 (IRIN) - Welcome to IRIN's
reading list. Every week our global network of specialist correspondents
share their top picks of recent must-read research, podcasts, reports,
blogs and in-depth articles to help you keep on top of global crises. We
also highlight key upcoming conferences, book releases and policy debates.



*Four to read:*

*How to integrate refugees
<http://www.oecd.org/migration/making-integration-work-humanitarian-migrants-9789264251236-en.htm>*

In 2015, Europe was in crisis mode as more than one million migrants and
refugees arrived in Italy and Greece. Most made their way to northern
Europe, hoping to find not just safety from war and persecution, but a
place to call home and begin new lives. With many more arrivals expected
this year, the UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR, and the International
Organization for Migration are urging European countries to start rapidly
scaling up their integration programmes.

How helpful then that the OECD, which groups advanced economies around the
world, has just published a report detailing best practice. “Making
Integration Work” is divided into 10 lessons or instructions for
policymakers: from helping refugees enter the labour market, to ensuring
access to language programmes and adapting initiatives to reflect their
diverse needs and skills. It does make it all sound a bit easy. It won’t be.

*The crushing of civil society
<https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2016/twin-threats>*

No need to read all 659 pages
<https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/world_report_download/wr2016_web.pdf>
of Human Rights Watch’s annual review to get the picture. 2015 was a
difficult year for efforts to defend the rights of people around the world.
Thanks to a handy online browser <https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2016>,
you can zoom in to your country of choice instead of wading through the
endless litany of abuse.

In an introductory essay
<https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2016/twin-threats>, HRW Executive
Director Kenneth Roth hits on two themes that concern him most: the
“Politics of Fear” and the “Crushing of Civil Society”.

“In Europe and the United States, a polarising us-versus-them rhetoric has
moved from the political fringe to the mainstream,” he warns. “Blatant
Islamophobia and shameless demonising of refugees have become the currency
of an increasingly assertive politics of intolerance.”

Roth’s second trend is less visible but potentially just as worrisome:
authoritarian governments increasing their choke-hold on civil society. By
depriving groups of funding from abroad and restricting their actions
through internal regulation, regimes – from China and Russia to Burundi and
Venezuela – are countering social media and finding new ways to monopolise
power.

*For those who can get to Amsterdam, Roth will be reflecting on the
findings of the report on Saturday, as part of a Human Rights Weekend
<http://www.debalie.nl/uitgelicht/human-rights-weekend-2016>, with film
screenings and master classes on everything from fragile states to the
refugee crisis, all open to the public.*

* The civilian toll in Iraq
<http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/IQ/UNAMIReport1May31October2015.pdf>*

We hear an awful lot about the war in Syria, or the Syria peace talks, less
so about Iraq. This UN report is therefore very timely. In 35 grim pages,
it systematically catalogues the multitude of ways Iraq’s conflict has
impacted civilians. “The violence against civilians remains staggering,” it
concludes, and the types of incidents Iraqis have been forced to endure is
disturbing: displacement, killings and abductions, sexual violence, and
destruction of property are just some of the categories included. The
so-called Islamic State is singled out for committing acts that the UN says
may amount to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and possibly genocide,
but Iraqi government forces and its allies aren’t spared either. Last year,
between 1 May and 31 October alone, the UN recorded 18,802 civilian deaths
as a result of the conflict. But – another sign of the scale of the
violence – it believes the real number of casualties is far higher than
they’ve been able to count.

*Auditing Afghanistan
<https://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/2016-01-30qr.pdf>*

The United States has invested more than $100 billion in Afghanistan since
its invasion at the end of 2001. Yes, you read that right: it’s actually
$109.7 billion to be precise. That’s more than the US spent on the Marshall
Pan to rebuild Europe after the Second World War. Yet, Afghanistan after 14
years of aid looks nothing like reconstructed West Germany in 1963. So,
where did all that money go? Was it wasted? Could some of it possibly have
been stolen? That’s what the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan
Reconstruction is trying to figure out. SIGAR has been auditing US aid
progammes and uncovering some shocking results. Its latest quarterly report
to Congress was released today and contains an insightful essay on
Afghanistan’s economy, which as you may have guessed, is a bit of a mess.
Growth rates have shrunk from 14.4 percent in 2012 to 1.3 percent in 2014.
This, despite billions poured into programmes aimed specifically at
economic development.

*Two on Burundi (one to listen to, then one to read):*

*AU not ready to deploy troops to Burundi
<http://www.sabc.co.za/news/a/628b52804b762cbd8f9def43e5868fd4/AU-not-ready-to-deploy-troops-to-Burundi:-Analyst--20160127>*

Africa is playing a much more assertive role in settling its own disputes,
but resolving the crisis in Burundi at this precise moment may be one step
too far. African heads of state have gathered in the Ethiopian capital
Addis Ababa for the 26th annual African Union summit. The sending of 5,000
peacekeepers to end the political violence in Burundi is on the agenda. The
AU’s Peace and Security Council authorised the deployment last month. But
seeing as the Burundian government has opposed it, likening it to an
“invasion”, two-thirds of AU members need to authorise the intervention. It
would also require a final green light from the UN Security Council.
Neither of those scenarios are likely, and Jakkie Cilliers of the
Pretoria-based Institute of Security Studies explains why.
<http://africacenter.org/2016/01/stopping-the-spiral-in-burundi/>

*Stopping the spiral in Burundi
<http://africacenter.org/2016/01/stopping-the-spiral-in-burundi/> *

Much has been written about the threat of genocidal violence in Burundi. In
this thoughtful analysis, Paul Nantulya provides a useful overview on the
escalation of the tit-for-tat killings between the government and an armed
opposition. He makes the important point that so far Burundians have
rejected ethnic-based incitement (despite chilling comments by government
officials). But, he is concerned that the rate of killings may “overwhelm
community resiliencies”. That’s why a mediator with more vim and commitment
than Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni is urgently needed to thrash out a
political settlement, which could then be supported by peacekeepers.
Nantulya argues that the African Union’s conflict resolution capacity is
also under examination in this crisis.

* One from IRIN:*

*Should airdrops be tried to save starving Syrians?
<http://www.irinnews.org/report/102392/should-airdrops-be-tried-to-save-starving-syrians>*

Since Madaya forced the plight of the anywhere between 400,000 and two
million Syrians
<http://www.irinnews.org/report/102355/briefing-all-you-need-to-know-about-sieges-in-syria>
living under siege onto the international stage, voices calling for
airdrops to save starving civilians have only become louder. Governments
and UN agencies say it can't be done effectively. But is it that simple?
IRIN’s Middle East Editor Annie Slemrod examines the pros and cons, the
possibilities and the impossibilities. If Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
is running aid planes to his loyalists, and the Russians are airdropping
supplies to a besieged city, why can’t the Americans, or the French, or the
British?

* One to listen to:*

* The coming Zika crisis
<http://www.globaldispatchespodcast.com/the-coming-zika-crisis/>*

We know the Zika virus is spreading rapidly throughout Latin America.
Twenty-three countries have already recorded infections and the World
Health Organization has warned that outbreaks are likely in every country
where the mosquito that carries the virus is present. But there is still
much that we don’t know about this mysterious tropical disease and the
public health implications – if it is proven beyond a doubt that pregnant
women who become infected with the virus are more likely to give birth to
children with serious birth defects. Global Dispatches has recorded a
podcast of an interview with one of the leading experts in tropical disease
– Doctor Peter Hotez of the National School of Tropical Medicine at the
Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. He outlines its dramatic spread in
Latin America and the Caribbean in recent months, noting that its arrival
in poverty-stricken countries like Haiti, where a small number of cases
have already been reported, could be particularly catastrophic. While we
will not know to what extent the Zika virus causes congenital conditions
like microcephaly for another nine months, he recommends learning the
lessons of the Ebola virus and immediately implementing public health
preparedness measures.

* One to look at:*

*Reimagining design after disasters
<http://www.scidev.net/global/design/multimedia/architects-reimagine-urban-design-disasters.html>*

Natural disasters are by their very nature, well, disastrous. But can they
also provide an opportunity to improve the way we live? An exhibition that
opened this week at the Institute of British Architects in London, called
Creation from catastrophe: How architecture rebuilds communities, looks at
the history of post-disaster reconstruction from the 17th century to the
present. It incorporates photographs, architectural drawings and scale
models to showcase innovative buildings being used in countries today, like
floating schools in Nigeria and “half-built homes” in Chile.

* Coming next:*

* Humanitarian Networks and Partnerships Week <http://www.hnpw.org/>*,
Geneva, 1-4 February

With countless networking events in the humanitarian world, we can’t blame
you for thinking: what will yet another conference accomplish? But HNPW is
unique in that it brings together specific technical networks, like INSARAG
(which sets standards for urban search and rescue), UNDAC (which
coordinates rapid response teams in the first phase of a disaster), GDACS
(which collates and distributes maps, satellite imagery and other real-time
information tools to analyze disasters) and UN-CMCOORD (a platform where
humanitarians and militaries can coordinate their responses to a disaster).
This year, a new network is being introduced that we’re particularly
interested in. The concept of H2H (humanitarian to humanitarian) was born
in a blog post
<http://www.academic-cowboy.org/2015/10/15/h2h-pieces-of-a-puzzle/> late
last year and is picking up steam. H2H emulates B2B in the private sector:
humanitarian organisations that provide services to other humanitarian
organisations rather than directly to those affected by crises (IRIN
considers itself one of them). “The good news is that we actually already
have a vibrant innovative ecosystem of [H2H] actors who are re-engineering
the way the system works,” writes Lars Peter Nissen, director of ACAPS
<http://www.acaps.org/>, another H2H organisation. “Unfortunately, this
ecosystem is all but invisible in mainstream humanitarian dialogue.” An
HNPW session <http://hnpw.org/?speaker=h2h> on 3 February seeks to change
that. Our Managing Editor Heba Aly will also be speaking on Day 2
<http://hnpw.org/?session=nepal-eq-lessons-learned> about how humanitarian
responders can better engage with communities affected by crises. See the
full programme here
<https://vosocc.unocha.org/GetFile.aspx?file=att46421_zucf7v.pdf>.

eds/ag

Access report online <http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=102397>
------------------------------
*Burundi - nobody to the rescue?
<http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=102398>*

[image: lead photo]NAIROBI, 29 January 2016 (IRIN) - It’s almost a given
that African leaders meeting today in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, will not
override Burundi’s objections and endorse the deployment of a 5,000-strong
intervention force to help end the violence in the troubled country.

The re-election
<https://solomondersso.wordpress.com/2016/01/28/the-new-peace-and-security-council-of-the-au/>
this week of Burundi to the African Union’s Peace and Security Council
(akin to the UN’s Security Council) for another two-year term was a clue
the will is not there to call Bujumbura’s bluff over its threat to resist
the deployment of the intervention force – known as MAPROBU.

There is general acceptance that the mediation of Ugandan President Yoweri
Museveni, under the auspices of the East African Community, has failed
<http://africanarguments.org/2016/01/27/burundi-what-can-actually-be-done/>.
He has been far too focused on his own re-election later this year to
invest the time and energy required.

The talk is of widening the mediation, for the AU and UN to take a more
hands-on role – effectively sidelining Museveni.

The key goal is to kick-start the abortive dialogue between the government
and opposition, which was postponed “indefinitely”
<http://www.irinnews.org/report/102350/uganda-feels-the-strain-of-the-burundi-crisis>
when Bujumbura’s representatives refused to show up in Arusha, Tanzania,
for the start of the talks on 6 January.

“Everybody agrees on the urgency, but nobody is putting anything on the
table,” said an African diplomat based in Addis Ababa. “[The parties] need
to be prodded, but the prodding doesn’t seem to be happening. Somebody, be
it the AU, the UN or other interested parties, need to put down a roadmap
around which talks can start.”

Last week a delegation
<http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=53069#.Vqt-UPl97IV> from the
UN Security Council visited Bujumbura to urge President Pierre Nkurunziza
to curtail the violence that has created 240,000 refugees, and to talk to
an opposition he regards as “terrorists” and “criminals”.

But instead, witnesses to the violence are being silenced.

On Tuesday the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights reported
that a team
<http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=53097#.VquMH_l97IU> of
independent experts “mandated to probe violations and abuses in Burundi”
had not been allowed to enter the country. Among the issues to be
investigated are reports from early December of mass graves.

Two foreign journalists – Le Monde’s Africa bureau chief Jean-Philippe Remy
and freelance photojournalist Phil Moore – were detained and then released
on Friday. They were among 17 people held in a raid on the Jabe neigborhood
of Bujumbura in which the police said a weapons cache was discovered.

Burundi has been in political crisis since Nkurunziza took the
controversial decision to seek a third presidential term last year.
Hundreds of people have reportedly been killed since then, amid the fear
the country could slide into civil war.

oa/ag

Access report online <http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=102398>
------------------------------
Copyright © IRIN. All rights reserved. Details:
http://www.irinnews.org/copyright

 unsubscribe <http://www.irinnews.org/registration/account/Unsubscribe>| change
your subscription settings <http://www.irinnews.org/registration/account/>


[image: Facebook]
<https://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/facebook/offer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irinnews.org&pubid=ra-5165551068a72215&ct=1&title=IRIN%20-%20%20the%20inside%20story%20on%20emergencies&pco=tbxnj-1.0>
[image:
Twitter]
<https://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/twitter/offer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irinnews.org&pubid=ra-5165551068a72215&ct=1&title=IRIN%20-%20%20the%20inside%20story%20on%20emergencies&pco=tbxnj-1.0>
[image:
WhatsApp]
<https://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/whatsapp/offer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irinnews.org&pubid=ra-5165551068a72215&ct=1&title=IRIN%20-%20%20the%20inside%20story%20on%20emergencies&pco=tbxnj-1.0>
[image:
LinkedIn]
<https://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/linkedin/offer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irinnews.org&pubid=ra-5165551068a72215&ct=1&title=IRIN%20-%20%20the%20inside%20story%20on%20emergencies&pco=tbxnj-1.0>
[image:
Addthis]
<https://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?source=tbx32nj-1.0&v=300&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irinnews.org&pubid=ra-5165551068a72215&ct=1&title=IRIN%20-%20%20the%20inside%20story%20on%20emergencies&pco=tbxnj-1.0>

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14ooKZo%2BdWTK1fxQGRSPD85Y4t2kkDbb4B80r2E7pYbaygA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to