*The LRA rising again?/ Institute for Security Studies 06.07.16*

For 30 years, Joseph Kony and his Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) have been
spreading appalling terror in northern Uganda, eastern Central African
Republic (CAR), western South Sudan and the eastern Democratic Republic of
the Congo (DRC).

By modest estimates, the LRA has killed 100 000 people, displaced about two
million, and raped, mutilated or abducted countless others. This includes
many children, who have been forced to become soldiers or sex slaves for
LRA fighters.

Its barbaric methods include dismembering its victims and slashing off
noses, lips, ears and limbs. Yet Kony – a self-styled Christian mystic,
though in reality a homicidal psychopath – has somehow eluded death or
capture.

His arch-enemy, Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni, threw everything at the
LRA, eventually driving it out of its birthplace in northern Uganda in
2006. But, like the cancer that it is, the LRA metastasised into the
neighbouring countries. Its fortunes then waxed and waned, according to
regional politics.

At its peak between 1987 and 2006, the LRA had about 20 000 fighters in the
field.

That was when Sudan was almost certainly lending it considerable support to
counter Uganda’s backing of Khartoum’s foe, the Sudan People's Liberation
Movement (SPLM) – now South Sudan’s ruling party.

Since then, Kony and the LRA have suffered several setbacks, perhaps most
significantly the formal resolution of the conflict between Khartoum and
Juba which ended some, but not all, of its critical support from Sudan.

In 2012, Uganda finally managed to persuade the African Union (AU) to
declare the LRA a terrorist organisation – rather than the movement for the
liberation of the Acholi people of northern Uganda, which it claimed to be.

That year, the AU also formed the Regional Coordination Initiative (RCI), a
political instrument of the affected countries, and the Regional Task Force
(RTF) – its military arm – to eliminate the LRA.

‘This 5 000-strong force, 40% of it Ugandan, and the rest contributed by
CAR, DRC and South Sudan, has significantly weakened the LRA,’ Martin Ewi,
a senior researcher at the Institute for Security Studies, said at a
seminar there last week.

The RTF has garnered substantial international financial and material
support, most notably from the United States Africa Command (US Africom),
which has had about 100 troops in the field since 2011.

This combination of measures has substantially depleted the LRA. From 2010
to 2013, LRA attacks decreased from about 500 to 150-160 a year; killings
from about 780 to under 40; and abductions from about 1 500 to about 500.
Several key LRA commanders have been killed, captured or and scattered
around the region, leaving Kony more isolated than ever.

But Ewi warned that the LRA was on the rise again, citing data from The
Resolve LRA Crisis Initiative. In 2015, the LRA had abducted 662 civilians
and conducted 198 attacks, killing 14. Already this year it had carried out
200 attacks, abducted 679 people and killed 19.

He attributed the rise to the inadequate resources of the RTF, including
insufficient training, equipment and inadequate intelligence capability.

‘Five thousand troops is not enough – given the territory it has to cover,’
Ewi said. But he also blamed a lack of common political purpose in the RCI,
along with growing instability and chaos in the region, which provides
cover for LRA activities.

Both US Africom and The Resolve LRA Crisis Initiative have estimated that
Kony now has under 200 fighters reporting to him; down from about 300
estimated by the United Nations in 2013, and a huge drop from the 20 000
believed to have been the LRA’s fighting strength between 1987 and 2006.

But Ewi warned that unless more support was thrown behind the RTF by the
international community and by other AU countries, Kony and the LRA could
regain their former numbers and strength. The Resolve does not quite agree
that the LRA is ever likely to return to its peak strength. Nevertheless,
in its latest report it warned that, ‘If given the chance, they are capable
of … reconstituting their command structure and slowly training new
recruits to replace lost fighters.’

In a briefing to the US Senate in March this year, Africom commander
General David Rodriquez reported considerable progress in the fight against
the LRA. But he also warned that while the LRA had lost at least 51 Ugandan
combatants in the 20 months between November 2012 and June 2014, it had
lost only nine in the 20 months between July 2014 and February 2016.

And Ewi said the recent sharp rise in abductions by the LRA suggested it
was making a concerted effort to fill the gaps in its ranks by forced
recruitment. He said the RTF needed greater intelligence capabilities –
which he saw as the key to success – as well as more training, advanced
equipment and financial support. The AU also needs to address the role of
Sudan as the key political impediment to eliminating the LRA.

The Resolve has claimed that, ‘The military training, safe haven, weapons,
and supplies the Sudanese government provided to the LRA from 1994–2004
were critical to the group’s growth into an increasingly deadly rebel
force.’

Though Sudan’s support declined after that, with the progress of the
Sudan-SPLM peace process, The Resolve says Sudan’s support has picked up
again. Since 2010, the Sudan army has been giving Kony and his senior
officers a safe haven in Kafia Kingi, the disputed Sudanese enclave in the
corner where Sudan, South Sudan and CAR meet. This is where Kony trades
poached ivory; which is one of his main sources of finance.

Khartoum also restricts access to the enclave for RTF troops. Khartoum’s
recent support for the LRA is because of its arch-enemy, Kampala’s, support
for South Sudan in continuing disputes with Sudan, says The Resolve.

An analyst who does not want to be named, agrees: ‘Khartoum has refused to
coordinate with the Regional Task Force. In a number of incidents, they
refused to give RTF access to Sudan to fish out LRA militants, who were
believed to be in Sudan, including in Darfur.’

Given the difficulty of the military efforts to eliminate him, is it
possible to contemplate a negotiated peace settlement with Kony?

Ewi thinks it should continue to be tried, though he cautions that two
previous attempts, in 2005 and 2007, both failed because of the deep
mistrust between Kony and his nemesis, Museveni. Kony basically demanded
guarantees of a safe haven in a regional country, but so far none has been
able to provide that guarantee. Right now, it is impossible to see Kony and
Museveni living under one roof, no matter what guarantees are given, says
Ewi.

And given the appalling nature of his atrocities and the fact that Kony is
the first fugitive of the International Criminal Court, giving him
sanctuary would be politically and legally unpalatable to many.

A heavy burden nonetheless rests on the AU to end the scourge of Kony and
the LRA. Apart from beefing up the military powers of the RTF, the AU
should clearly exert all of its political leverage to ensure Khartoum no
longer supports them. That could just prove to be the decisive factor in
ending one of Africa’s longest-running and almost-forgotten conflicts.

Peter Fabricius, ISS Consultant

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oraeSP162TkQk-WjbZeyQJHbzmx2EVeD9eWJCHBdaJc4Q%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to