United Nations Trusteeship is the best option to resolve the crisis in
South Sudan
Jul. 16 Featured <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/featured/>,
Uncategorized <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/uncategorized/> no
comments
<http://www.southsudannation.com/united-nations-trusteeship-is-the-best-option-to-resolve-the-crisis-in-south-sudan/#respond>

BY: Dr. Lako JADA KWAJOK, UK, JUL/16/2016, SSN;

To many South Sudanese, the 9th of July each year is a day for joy and
magnificent celebrations all over the country. There is nothing unusual
about such expectations in a day that marks our independence following a
protracted war that resulted in massive losses of human lives, material,
and a consequent underdevelopment of the country.

People were filled with dismay following the cancellation of the 2016
anniversary because of lack of funds. But never in a million years did
anyone envisage that the gates of hell would open in South Sudan on the
very day it gained its independence.

The deadly clash outside the Presidential Palace (J1) in Juba on Friday
08/07/2016 was the final nail in the coffin of trust between the two
parties; SPLM/A-IO and SPLM/A-IG. The triggering event was the killing of
Lt. Colonel George Gismala and Sgt. Domach Koat Pinyien on 02/07/2016 by
elements of the National Security Service (NSS) and Military Intelligence
(MI).

>From there, the tension between the two sides escalated significantly and
culminated in a further shooting incident on 07/07/2016. It was obvious to
sharp observers that SPLM/A-IG has opted for war and the shooting of the
two SPLM/A-IO military men were the first shots in it.

In the aftermath of the carnage at J1, President Kiir stated that he does
not know who was behind it. Reports indicate that a large force came from
nowhere and attacked the SPLM/A-IO guards deployed outside the presidential
palace.

It appeared to be a coordinated attack with the presidential guards already
positioned outside J1 joining the “unknown force” in the fight against
SPLM/A-IO guards. Only a person with remarkable naivety would believe that
President Kiir has nothing to do with what happened.

Even if we give him the benefit of the doubt, how could the attack on
SPLM/A-IO headquarters and Machar’s residence the next day, be explained?
Is there anyone on planet Earth who believes that thousands of army troops
supported by artillery units, tanks, and helicopter gunships could launch
such a major offensive without the blessing and knowledge of the Commander
in Chief?

The regime, in its moment of madness never spared a thought for the
consequences of its actions. Suppose Kiir and his supporters succeeded in
wiping out the entire SPLM/A-IO leadership – what then? Would South Sudan
attain a lasting peace?

The regime seems to hold the erroneous belief that its problems are caused
by certain personalities, therefore, neutralising or liquidating these
individuals would pave the way for the consolidation of its rule over South
Sudan.

But it’s up against the reality that the overwhelming majority of the
people are behind the opposition, hence, there will never be any shortage
in filling up any vacant leadership position.

The fact that these ugly events took place around independence day, sent a
message to the whole world that South Sudan lacks responsible leadership.
Those who have been sceptical regarding South Sudan becoming an independent
state now feel vindicated.

However, the fact of the matter isn’t that the South Sudanese communities
are incompatible with each other or unable to coexist peacefully. They have
been living together as tribal communities neighbouring each other for
centuries.

There hadn’t been any hostilities in our ancient past on the scale we are
witnessing now. The majority of the populace are law-abiding and
peace-loving people.

The unfortunate reality is that the country is being misruled by a bunch of
sadistic leaders who do not give a damn about the future of the country.

Self-enrichment through rampant corruption, targeting of political rivals
and adherence to a divisive policy on ethnic lines are the reasons that
landed the country in the current predicament. The regime has utterly
failed in all aspects of good governance.

Calling it a government is a sort of a misnomer as there is no government
in the world where civil servants, teachers, university lecturers and
soldiers do not receive salaries for 3 to 4 months. It even resorted to the
medieval practice whereby soldiers are allowed to rape and loot as part of
dividing the spoils or payment for their services.

There is a difference though as the victims in the medieval era were
subjects of conquered countries and not citizens of the same country.

Not long ago, India today TV station and several news outlets reported that
the government of South Sudan sanctioned its soldiers to rape and loot as
payment for their salaries. These abominable acts were confirmed by Human
Rights Watch (HRW) and several relief organisations – what a disgrace!

The second misnomer is the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) which is
said to be the national army of South Sudan. The name itself creates a
paradox as on one hand South Sudan chose secession from Sudan and on the
other it continues to use the name that relates to Sudan.

The SPLA is anything but a national army. It’s composed overwhelmingly of
one ethnicity, the Jieng, making it a tribal army. It lacks discipline,
training, structured chain of command and standard rules of engagement. It
often resorts to looting, destruction of properties and extrajudicial
killings.

Following the recent ceasefire in Juba, the whole world witnessed how the
SPLA ransacked Juba markets, private homes and properties belonging to
citizens. Even the UN World Food Programme (WFP) central warehouse in Juba
was not spared by the unruly SPLA soldiers.

The WFP has been delivering vital services to the needy population of South
Sudan and presumably saved many lives.

What took place is not the behaviour people would expect from a national
army. Those soldiers brought nothing but shame and disdain on South Sudan.

We must remember that President Kiir and the National Legislative Assembly
(NLA) lost legitimacy on 09/07/2014. Signing the Agreement on Resolution of
Conflict in South Sudan (ARCISS) restored their legitimacy for the purpose
of implementing the peace accord.

Apparently, the recent hostilities have dealt ARCISS a fatal blow. Anyone
who thinks that there is hope in enacting ARCISS is only burying his or her
head in the sand. It’s time to consider other avenues that could rescue the
South Sudanese people from an imminent catastrophe.

*There is a growing consensus among a significant number of South Sudanese
that supports UN takeover of the country until it’s able to function as a
viable state. A 5-year period under UN Trusteeship would give the country
the chance to start afresh on sound foundations. *

During the said period it would be possible to establish an inclusive
system of governance and develop equitable government policies. The
international community should avoid being complacent as it’s not in
anyone’s best interest to allow the replication of the Rwanda’s horrors.

Those who are concerned about the breach of the sovereignty of an
independent state must understand that a failed state has no sovereignty.
Even from the citizens’ perspective, it has no value when the state fails
to deliver essential services, uphold the rule of law and promote peace and
harmony between its communities.

Moreover, with the growing influx of refugees across the borders to the
neighbouring countries, South Sudan has become a destabilising entity in
the area and a real threat to regional security.

There is an urgent need for a pre-emptive intervention by the UN to save
lives, prevent massive population displacement and avert widespread famine.

Dr. Lako Jada Kwajok

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14opjiSiQZeeL9cubF5TchufD6kiUpoX6kKSVhi8BVB9BGw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to