A red scar on African poetry: Anatomy of a serial plagiarist
Posted on December 5, 2016 by Tom Jalio
Just weeks after winning two prestigious awards on his 29th birthday,
globally published Kenyan poet Redscar McOdindo was found to have
cheated his way to fame and fortune.
Credit: Tom Jalio.
Before he was found out, Redscar McOdindo was the toast of the African
poetry scene. Credit: Tom Jalio.
“If I write any frequently, it is because you pals inspire me to do
so,” Kenyan poet Redscar McOdindo once said. “If I like sharing, it is
because you pals deserve all that is mine and much more. I’ll try and
keep it up (if it is any good) and better still, share more frequently
(if that is any possible).”
His thoughts spoke of a poet fond of adulation, nagged by self-doubt
and under pressure to impress. He was responding to a comment from a
Facebook friend “amazed” by his latest poetic note, Please Come Home,
Daddy, about a runaway father deemed a member of violent sect Mungiki
without trial.
That was in January 2011. Two weeks later, the piece won Redscar the
$20 Fern Poetry Prize.
Fast-forward to August 2016 and Redscar, now 28 going on 29, was in
the big league of poetry, shortlisted in one Kenyan and two
continental prizes after a blitz of entries. He was up for the
Writivism Festival’s $500 Okot p’Bitek Poetry in Translation award,
the Babishai Poetry Festival’s $700 accolade and, in his home country,
the $1,000 Nyanza Literary Festival (Nalif) poetry prize. He stood to
earn $2,200 in two days if the judges ruled in his favour.
With two of these events in Uganda, 26 August found Redscar seated
under a tent in the lush, suburban gardens of its capital city,
Kampala. He was listening to a Friday morning talk I was moderating
entitled: “What are Ugandan women ‘poeting’ about?” It was the last
discussion on the third and final day of the Babishai Poetry Festival.
While other guests dressed casually or traditionally, the slim,
baby-faced doctor-poet looked geeky in a short-sleeved, chequered
shirt and slightly cracked glasses. Not all guests walked around with
their tags, but Redscar wore his like a badge of honour. Being on a
shortlist of five meant he’d surpassed some 600 contestants from
around the continent to a potential podium finish.
“Writing is healthy if you write what you need to write, as opposed to
what will make money or fame,” I quoted African American poet Alice
Walker as saying. I asked panellist Lillian Aujo from Uganda if
writing should, therefore, be an end in itself, and if so, “What good
are competitions?”
As we spoke, Redscar was trying a second time to clinch Babishai. He’d
made the long list last year with There Should Be Places and We
Carried Him Home but missed the shortlist. The budding poet profiled
himself as a “dream chaser” who “experiments with words in his
subterranean laboratory”. The experiments had led to publication in
several anthologies, blogs, journals, magazines and newspapers, mostly
in Kenya. His poetry ranged from snapshots of life in free verse to
thought pieces on social issues.
I’d joined the ranks of his 1,864 Facebook friends last year but met
him for the first time at Babishai. He responded to prompts in my
festival autograph book in a neat, compact handwriting, nothing like
the scribbles doctors are famous for. Under “Notable Works”, other
guests had listed a poem, book or blog they were particularly proud
of, but Redscar simply wrote “Poetry”. His “Likes”: “Art, Life”. His
“Role Models”: “Creatives who create beautifully”.
redscar-autograph
His ticket to Babishai was How the World Wishes You Fixed It, which
presented girls’ circumcision, a lingering tradition in rural Africa,
as the Waterloo of a “Mr Fixit”. A preview in Kenyan literary magazine
Enkare Review, which appointed Redscar poetry editor on the eve of his
trip to Uganda, said: “The fact that it deals with female genital
mutilation makes it a huge favourite, if the judges will be looking
for a poem that even remotely serves the social function of
literature.”
It was the latest in a string of plaudits since 2011, when the
now-defunct Fern Prize commended Redscar for flair that “appeals to
all audiences but also speaks to a cause”. In a 2013 Daily Nation
critique of “clowns” in the Kenyan industry, he was counted among ten
“real” poets who were the exception. In 2014, he was seventh in a list
of 32 young Kenyan writers publishing company Lesleigh thought ought
to publish books. Last year, his work featured in an anthology of Best
New African Poets. And in May this year, the literary site Kenyan Poet
ranked him ninth in a list of 20 poets “redefining the art form”.
So while he cut an introverted figure at Babishai, Redscar’s literary
cheering squad was as loud as the constant hammering on a construction
site opposite the festival venue.
“Yes, I think writing is therapeutic. Writers should not get carried
away by competitions,” Aujo said. “But they also need to earn from
their sweat.”
A downpour started just as I wrapped up the session. While waiting to
be whisked away for lunch, Redscar posted an update on Facebook.
“Kenyans in Kampala prefer WiFi to food. Well, except Sanya Noel,” he
wrote, citing his fellow finalist. “Sanya is only using the WiFi to
find food joints.”
Hours later, Sanya got the last laugh.
Double triumph in one day
“And the winner is… Sanya Noel.” A cheer rose from the Kenyans at the
awards ceremony on a rooftop terrace restaurant. It was quickly
supplanted by groans as they rushed to tweet the news but couldn’t
find WiFi. The suspense was lost on Redscar, as he’d finished fourth
in the top-five countdown. Still, he graciously congratulated Sanya,
knowing he had two more shots at glory the next day, 27 August, which
also happened to be his birthday.
Sanya described Redscar in the Standard as a reclusive poet who rarely
comes out into the light. He quoted him saying, all too modestly, “I
want my works to open up my way, not the other way round”.
Like a birthday wish come true, Redscar’s way opened up like the Red
Sea the next day, as he swept both the Nalif and the Writivism awards.
Besides $1,500 in cash, this earned him a publishing contract,
mentorship opportunities and one-month writing residency.
It was a meteoric rise for someone who, in his own words, had only
started writing “serious, publishable poems” two years earlier. “I am
willing to take it to any level possible now,” Redscar told the Daily
Nation after winning Nalif in his home county of Kisumu in Kenya.
Two days later, he was front and centre in a Facebook photo from the
event, posing under a tree among a dozen youths and festival
organisers, with his arms over the shoulders of his companions. His
smile, as always, was tight-lipped.
“Creatives come in different shades and hues. These Nalif finalists
did not disappoint,” he captioned the picture. “It is wondrous how
lovely and encouraging such people can be.” A separate photo showed
him receiving a $1,000-dummy cheque for the Nalif prize, his sleeves
rolled up workmanlike, as though celebrating his toil in writing For
Crying Out Loud and Other Poems.
During the September-October submission window, Redscar didn’t rest on
his laurels. He flooded the market with poems, applying the same gusto
with which he’d approached the awards season. By the time he was
published in the Shade Journal (from Minnesota) on 27 September, his
profile, hereby annotated with origins, read:
“His work has appeared, or is forthcoming, in African American Review
(Missouri), Tupelo Quarterly (Massachusetts), Foundry (California),
Callaloo (Texas), Rattle (California), Clarion (Boston), Transition
(Harvard), SAND (Berlin), Mandala (Georgia), One (North Carolina),
EXPOUND (Nigeria), Lawino (Uganda), Jalada (Kenya), Saraba (Nigeria),
Brittle Paper (South Africa), Poetry Potion (South Africa), various
anthologies, and elsewhere.”
The next day, he notched Poem of the Week in The Missing Slate
(Pakistan) with A Dua for the Masses, a nuanced piece about conflicted
Muslim girls. News of his publications punctuated his timeline every
other day. “Rejections are not personal,” he reflected on Facebook on
4 October, “but acceptances are.”
For four more days, he was the toast of Kenyan poetry and a
fast-rising star in Africa. And then came the statement that shook the
industry to the core.
Busted two months after awards
“Investigations by our editors have left us with little doubt that
Redscar McOdindo K’Oyuga is a serial plagiarist,” The Missing Slate
stated on 8 October, addressing complaints about A Dua for the Masses.
“In the last month alone, Redscar’s blog [Let’s Tell These Tales] has
published at least three poems plagiarised (typically with only minor
alterations) from the work of other poets. In each case, the original
poem belonged to a female writer of colour.”
This brought back something Redscar said at Babishai over lunch: “A
man is a woman who is everything a man can be, but not everything a
woman can be.” A man is a woman? We’d unquestioningly chalked it up to
his wit.
The journal cited Indian Chandini Santosh, Somali Briton Hamdi Khalif
(two poems) and Syrian American Zanzooba Magdoos as poets Redscar had
plagiarised. It said that he had restricted access to his blog, but
added: “It seems likely that further research will reveal additional
incidences of plagiarism.”
Redscar hadn’t just sneaked across the red line of plagiarism with
rephrased lines and synonyms; he’d leapt across it with huge chunks of
verbatim text. In both Zanzooba’s untitled poem and his version, the
personas were “stuck somewhere between night visions and dance clubs”,
and “struggling to fuse worlds apart into peace be upon you and pieces
be into me”. The perspective was changed from “you” to “the ones”,
alongside one or two other tweaks in an otherwise wholesale
replication.
That night, Redscar posted a status update. “You’ll hear and read
about a lot. Allegations will be made. You’ll judge or you’ll be
sensitive. Hopefully, you’ll observe sobriety,” he said. “In the end,
you’ll realise it has been a great misunderstanding. You’ll marvel at
how genuine we all are, because we care and respect.”
It was as good as pleading not guilty without an alibi. But this was
not a problem to be solved with philosophical musings. Had he, like
the persona in the Fix It poem, encountered the unfixable? He seemed
to reach his breaking point an hour later. Wishing condolences to a
Georgia-based Facebook friend with no clear ties to him beyond social
media, he added a chilling message at the end of the post: “RIP
Pecolia Johnson, like I soon will.”
He then deactivated his social media accounts and stopped taking
calls, including, if not especially, from prize givers. Everyone
desperately needed answers, but in their place were the one thing
Redscar had listed as ‘Dislikes’ in my autograph book: “Voids”.
‘Charlatan… despicable… turd’
For a while, nothing happened. Then on the sleepy Sunday morning of 9
October, shares of The Missing Slate statement yanked away the blanket
of blissful ignorance.
As though summoned to a public stoning of Redscar with words, the
literary community lashed out with a vengeance. Largely oblivious to
the ominous last statement on his now inaccessible Facebook page, they
called Redscar a “charlatan”, “despicable”, the “turd of Kenyan
poetry”. He became the poster boy for plagiarism and its presumed
causes: a cheat-to-pass education system, a get-rich-quick mentality,
a corruption-riddled society.
Some friends pushed back against the perceived schadenfreude, arguing
that Redscar must be remorseful. The problem was that Redscar’s
evasiveness implied he was only sorry he got caught. Attempts to
defend him fizzled on Monday, when The Missing Slate tweeted, “We now
have evidence of more than 10 poems plagiarised by Redscar McOdindo.
Looking increasingly like none of his work is original.” The
additional victims included Lebanese Zeina Hashem Beck, Malawian Upile
Chisale and Zimbabwean Frank Malaba, the latter revealing that male
poets were also targeted.
One person who was not surprised was Eddie from South Africa
(@RogueAcademic_). “I know Redscar from way back. He is a serial
plagiarist,” he tweeted. “When Nalif awarded him, I was like, haiboo.”
Pushed for details, Eddie elaborated, “Ours were interactions on FB
and Google groups. Most of the time he was called out.”
Redscar’s Kenyan friend Abu Amirah, who received the Okot p’Bitek
prize in Kampala on his behalf, was disillusioned. “I remember
thinking to myself just how talented he was that he wasn’t present
because he had to be at another festival,” he commented on
jamesmurua.com, a literary blog. “Then this? Truly sad.”
On Tuesday, plagiarised poet Malaba issued a scathing response. “This
bullcrap must be stopped,” he blazed in a Facebook rant, adding that
he’d reported Redscar to the police and was ready to fly to Kenya to
hunt him down. “One would think that poetry competitions have ways of
checking plagiarism before dishing out prizes to thieves.”
Kenyan blogger James Murua, who’s covered African literature for a
decade, told me, “This is the first time I’ve seen this scale of
intellectual property theft. Usually it’s one poem that’s reworked to
one’s needs. A whole body of work is new.” Indeed, not since 2004,
when South African Melanie Grobler used a translation of Canadian Anne
Michaels’ poem to win the Eugýne Marais award, had the continent’s
poetry prize scene been rocked by plagiarism, but Redscar’s took the
cake.
On Wednesday, Beck, another of Redscar’s victims, wrote on Twitter,
“It’s not OK to claim other writers’ words, their hours of work, as
your own. NOT OK.” And Upile wrote on Instagram, “When someone steals
your poem and wins some money. Where’s my check at, though? This is so
heartbreaking.”
South African author Zukiswa Wanner closed out the dramatic week with
an “epitaph” for Redscar’s poetry career. “For a short while, he got
fame and a small fortune in prize money,” she wrote in the Saturday
Nation. “But in a short time, that fame has turned to notoriety.”
But this was no storm in a tea cup. It was a train wreck. In the
debris of its ruins lay years of rave reviews from the literary
community, online and print circulation of misrepresented works, a
hijacked tribute to African stalwart Okot p’Bitek on Song of Lawino’s
50th anniversary, and competitions altered by enough plagiarised
entries to fill a chapbook:
“Seven of the eight poems Redscar presented were stolen almost word
for word, with only the title(s) and a few phrases altered,” Nalif
said, rescinding its award. “Two of the five poems Redscar submitted,
A Dua for the Masses and She was Born Natural, contain ideas and words
that belong to other poets,” Writivism said, adding that it was still
investigating. “Redscar’s poem that appeared on the long list in 2015
[We Carried Him Home] was plagiarised,” Babishai said.
The organisations said they were unable to reach Redscar, meaning
prize monies were unaccounted for, but there were other financial and
opportunity costs incurred. These included three days of talks, spoken
word performances and networking opportunities at Babishai and an
extra day’s worth of literary experience at Nalif — along with
transport, hotel and food costs — all enjoyed at the expense of a more
deserving poet.
His fifteen minutes of fame had inflicted an inordinate amount of
pain. If anything lasted a “short while”, it was the attention granted
to the region’s biggest literary scandal, such that by the time a
commentary on it by Babishai judge Stephen Partington ran in the
Nairobian on November 10, it hardly drew any shares on social media.
Time heals, but sometimes a scar remains.
Red flags and legal implications
As organisations scrambled to purge Redscar’s posts from their
archives, pulp his work from print editions and, in Enkare’s case, to
fire him as poetry editor, they said, a little too late, that they do
not condone plagiarism.
It emerged from the statements and online chatter from some
gatekeepers that submitters’ claims to originality had been assumed to
be true without examination. When Redscar displayed an intimate
knowledge of women’s logic in going natural with their hair, it was
the empathy of a perceptive writer. When he incorporated Arabic script
and phonetics, it was the sophistication of a world-wise poet. When
his text had echoes of other poets, it was within the boundaries of
influence.
Plagiarism rears its ugly head often in other fields, but there was a
collective surprise when it scarred African poetry. To quote English
poetry sleuth Ira Lightman, “The poetry world functions on trust”.
When there’s a workshop on shortlisted poems, for instance, people
don’t turn up with plagiarism checkers. They give the writer the
benefit of the doubt.
But Redscar’s case imparted the lesson that editors and judges cannot
afford to take authenticity for granted. All the time and money put
into publicity, logistics and whittling down hundreds of submissions
is undone when you publish or reward the wrong person.
It’s a setback for poetry’s place in Africa as well. Viewed as too
complex by many readers and grossly underappreciated by most
publishers, it has experienced a renaissance the past few years
through concerts, festivals and publications exclusive to the genre,
especially in Uganda. One fake poet can’t take all that away, but
scandal has a way of making headlines more than good news.
It is understandable, therefore, that the scandal was greeted with so
much outrage. According to intellectual property lawyer Victor Nzomo,
Redscar didn’t get himself off the hook by blocking the blog that
contained his plagiarised poems. However, his offence is not
synonymous with copyright infringement, which involves reproducing,
distributing or performing someone’s work without permission.
While infringement is punishable by law through damages or fines,
“Plagiarism is an ethical issue,” Nzomo told me. “Different
professions have different sanctions and remedies to deal with it.” In
any case, litigation is “expensive and time-consuming”, he said, so
one should “try and settle out of court by confronting plagiarists
directly”.
Breaking contact with friend and foe has spared Redscar the ignominy
of such an encounter. But his exile is a double-edged sword, for he is
in a literary prison, shorn of credibility.
It is poetic justice.
How Redscar doctored poems
Funny enough, plagiarism was discussed on the first day of Babishai.
During a talk on digital publishing, a member of the audience said he
shied away from blogging because it often happened that someone would
pick his content, re-edit it and make it his own on social media.
Redscar must’ve squirmed in his seat, but nobody suspected him at the
time. Murua, who was on the panel, quipped, “If your work is not good
enough to be stolen, it’s not good enough”.
As Malaba and company showed, though, imitation is hardly flattering
in poetry. More than most art forms, it is a deeply personal form of
expression. Improper citation of sources in academic papers is
intellectual malaise. Lifting for journalism purposes is
unprofessional conduct. But taking the unique inspiration poetry
demands and passing it off as your own is a betrayal, especially to
the people you led to believe in your grandiloquence.
In the aftermath of Babishai, like everyone else, I was clueless to
Redscar’s cheating. I featured him in two of the photos accompanying
my story of the festival, which ran in the Star. In one of them, he
was in the background of a spoken word performance titled I Am Who I
Am.
So when the scandal broke on 8 October, I struggled to come to terms
with the claim that Redscar the prolific poet was, in fact, not a poet
at all. I took a second look at his responses to my autograph book
questions and thought: no wonder he was so vague. The reluctance to
take credit for any of “his” notable works was particularly telling.
A background check revealed he’s an A-student who studied medicine and
surgery at the University of Nairobi. Since 2009, he’s been elected
secretary of his primary school alumni association, chairman of the
high school version, and treasurer of one welfare association and two
youth groups. He’s risen from volunteer of the year at a dermatology
NGO to departmental manager of the year.
Nothing there indicated a failure who could one day take short-cuts in
life, but weren’t his poetry credentials equally impressive? Perhaps
his earlier works would shed light on his behaviour. I ran his
earliest feted poem (Please Come Home) and the one that got him to
Babishai this year (Fix It) through a plagiarism checker. Both passed
the test. It seemed a blanket accusation to say “none of his work” is
original.
“Sometimes he altered the original text fairly extensively,” Missing
Slate managing editor Jacob Silkstone told me. “Of the poems we’ve
seen, all included at least some plagiarised lines.” Silkstone said
they had only “scratched the surface” of Redscar’s poems before he
took his blog off the grid. But in my research, I found that he had
two older blogs that were still accessible: 2010-15’s Ushairi wa
Redscar and 2011’s Poetically Prose.
I checked sample posts for plagiarism. I drew a blank on the Kiswahili
blog. However, it didn’t take me long to find a plagiarised poem on
the English one. Letter to My Unborn Child had a 97% similarity to an
untitled poem by Okhwa Wanjala Nabutola, which had previously been
published on Kenyan Poet. It was the first case I’d come across in
which Redscar plagiarised a fellow Kenyan — and it was a whole five
years before he was exposed.
While the plagiarism was only now coming into public consciousness,
Eddie was right; Redscar had been at it since “way back”. And in the
end, it was complaints from readers familiar with A Dua for the Masses
that proved his undoing, not checks by industry guards.
That Redscar has a passion for poetry is manifest in his multiple
blogs and Facebook notes over six years. That not all his works have
been discredited means I cannot, in good faith, claim he never had his
own muse. But once he started cheating, this much, I know, is true:
Redscar did not just flirt with plagiarism during awards season. It
was a long-term hobby that only found new openings in 2016 (“about ten
journals this year alone,” Babishai said). He would comb through
various sources (printed texts, Tumblr, Vimeo, blogs) for poetry from
around the world or for prose he could break into stanzas. He would
sift through the content until he found narratives that would wow
publishers and prize givers.
If the persona was too much of a departure from him, he would change
the point of view from, say, “I” to “she”. If the source material had
elements of an exotic world, he would swap them with local words to
transplant it into a Kenyan setting. If need be, he would translate
the text into his mother tongue, Dholuo.
He would be more blatant in his copy-pasting if the original poem was
untitled, thinking that made it harder to trace. He would piece a poem
together from different sources sometimes. He would not be deterred if
the original poem had a copyright symbol at the bottom. If he got
called out in a Google group or some other space away from the radar
of the decision makers, he would view it as a bump in the road, not a
turning point.
Redscar would look for outlets to submit to and competitions to enter,
and use his impressive portfolio as a literary open sesame. He would
do it over and over again until his appropriated work was accepted,
his feigned brilliance awarded. He would not stop until someone
somewhere blew the whistle loud enough to awaken the literati.
“We offered him an opportunity to defend his apparent plagiarism or
send an apology to Zanzooba, rather than force us to issue a public
statement,” Silkstone told me. “But Redscar offered an unconvincing
excuse and then took his blog offline.”
Redscar responded by going underground and refusing to answer any
calls. But eventually, I managed to get through to him. I offered him
another chance to own up or disprove the allegations.
“I’m not ready to comment yet but I will soon, at an opportune time,”
he said. He wouldn’t say how soon that may be, or on which forum.
The friend in me wishes him safety. The poet in me shares the rage of
his victims. And the journalist in me hopes the vigilance aroused will
not give way to complacency, as the topic fades from the headlines.
Trail of plagiarism
The following is a provisional list of Redscar’s victims, the poems
plagiarised and their falsified titles, hereby shared to restore them
to their rightful owners.
African American Nijla Mu’min, Poem for People Who Ask When I
‘Went Natural’ (renamed She Was Born Natural)
African American Sjohnna McCray, excerpt from The Savages in the
Suburbs (renamed Things We Learn)
American Mercedes Lawry, We Knew Her to a Small Degree (renamed
They Call Us Chokosh)
Indian Chandini Santosh, From This Side of the Border (republished untitled)
Kenyan Okhwa Wanjala Nabutola, Untitled (renamed Letter to My Unborn Child)
Lebanese Zeina Hashem Beck, Relentless (renamed For Crying Out Loud)
Malawian Upile Chisale, Untitled (renamed Can’t She Just Be Herself?)
Nigerian Esame Okwoche, The Okani-Nkam Modern Day Project
(excerpted and renamed: We Carried Him Home)
Nigerian Michael Larri, The Best Way to Fade (part of Some 51/2 Words)
Nigerian Rasaq Malik, For Love (renamed Resolution)
Singaporean Theophilus Kwek, Little India (renamed Kondele Express)
Somali Briton Hamdi Khalif, Pain and Pleasure and Her Value Lies
in Her Vagina (both republished untitled)
Syrian American Zanzooba Magdoos, Untitled (renamed A Dua for the Masses)
Zimbabwean Frank Malaba, Where? (part of Some 51/2 Words)
And counting.
Tom Jalio is an editor by day, writer by night, runner part-time. He
won the Babishai Poetry Award in 2014 with There was once something
special here. His short story, No rest for the wicked, appeared in the
2013 anthology Nairobi Grit. Follow him on twitter at @tjalio.
Copyright © Tom Jalio 2016.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or
subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your
feed reader.
This entry was posted in African Politics Now. Bookmark the permalink.
4 thoughts on “A red scar on African poetry: Anatomy of a serial plagiarist”
Duncan McGibbon says:
December 5, 2016 at 12:43 pm
How come the plagiarised poems weren’t already being praised on
their own terms? If the plagiarists poems were deemed prizeworthy
under his name. they should already have been given prizes. The
culture of PR and social media drowns real talent.
Tom Jalio says:
December 5, 2016 at 8:18 pm
Hi, Duncan.
Thank you for your feedback. Actually, the poets plagiarised were
achievers in their own right. Sjohnna McCray won two esteemed prizes
last year: the Walt Whitman Award and the Emerson Poetry Prize.
Zanzooba Magdoos was a finalist in The Feminist Wire Poetry Contest
last year. Upile Chisala was one of seven African women poets singled
out for praise by Okay Africa magazine. And so on, and so forth. But
indeed, there are real-life achievers and creations of social media.
Cheers,
Jalio
Jon Pen de Ngong says:
December 7, 2016 at 11:06 am
Wow, the first question that hit my mind was: First, let me check
if I am (not) there>>>!
Tom Jalio says:
December 8, 2016 at 5:58 pm
Hehe! You’re not alone, Jon. His previous publishers who were
unaware have been equally perturbed. Please share widely to create
awareness.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
--
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14opJAri0%2B4ZCx6MFvzOyo_q7goE5uM7oUFYmDW%3DP_jdBmQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
