Ethiopia sees surge in refugees from South Sudan, UN says

   - Article <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61930#tabs-1>
   - Comments (4) <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61930#tabs-2>

[image: email] Email
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=61930>
[image: print] Print
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=61930>
[image: pdf]Save
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=61930&nom_fichier=article_61930>
[image: separation]
[image: increase] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61930#>
[image: decrease] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61930#>
[image: separation]
[image: separation]
------------------------------

[image: Wrist-banding of newly-arrived south Sudanese refugees at the Pagak
entry point, Gambella. On 4 November 2016 (UNHCR Ethiopia-Photo)]
By Tesfa-Alem Tekle

March 18, 2017 (ADDIS ABABA) - The number of South Sudan refugees fleeing
to neighbouring Ethiopia has seen a surge since the beginning of March, the
UN refugee agency said on Saturday.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in a statement it
extended to Sudan Tribune Saturday said over 600 South Sudan refugees are
crossing borders to Ethiopia in March on daily basis, due to the ongoing
conflict and food scarcity.

“The daily arrival rate has significantly jumped from 103 persons in
February and 199 in February to 660 so far in March,” it said.

Between 1 and 11 March 2017, a total of 7,258 South Sudanese refugees have
arrived in Ethiopia’s Gambella region.

Of these, 3,967 arrived in the week of 6 to 11 March, representing a daily
average arrival rate of 660 people.

The latest influx has brought the total number of South Sudanese refugees
who have arrived in Ethiopia since September 2016 to 68,858.

All the new arrivals have gone through level-1 registration and were most
of them relocated to Nguenyyiel refugee camp, one of South Sudan refugee
camps in Gambela region bordering South Sudan.

Pagak, a border town of South Sudan continues to be the main entry point
through which an increasing number of South Sudanese refugees are crossing
into Gambella, Ethiopia.

Between 1 February and 11 March 2017, a total of 12,828 refugees crossed
through Pagak.

So far in March, 7,258 arrivals were registered in Pagak and all, but 192,
were relocated to Nguenyyiel refugee camp while other new arrivals remain
in Pagak, awaiting relocation.

According to the latest report, 65% of the total registered new arrivals
are children, including 15,488 unaccompanied and separated children.

A recent sample survey conducted in Pagak revealed that the new arrivals
originated mainly from Upper Nile State (Nasir, Longechuk or Mathiang,
Ulang and Maiwut Counties) and Jonglie State (Uror, Akobo and Ayod
Counties).

Conflict and food insecurity were cited as the main reasons for leaving
South Sudan.

The majority (87%) continue to be women and children. A good number of
those who arrived in March originated from Bentiu.

According to the UN refugee agency, as of 15 March, Ethiopia hosted more
than 356,000 South Sudanese refugees who originate mostly from Upper Nile
and Jonglie States, as well as some from the Unity state.

In addition to registration and protection, WASH, Nutrition, Primary Health
Care and other services are available and functioning well at the entry
point.

As South Sudan refugees continue to flee to Ethiopia in large numbers,
UNHCR in close collaboration with its Ethiopian partner, Administration for
Refugees and Returnees Affairs (ARRA) is in the process of ensuring maximum
preparedness by reviewing the capacity of Nguenyiel camp and the
identification of possible sites for new camps.

"With Nguenyyiel quickly reaching its capacity and no readily available
site for establishing additional camps in the Gambella region, the
possibility of transferring new arrivals to the Benishangul- Gumuz Region
is being considered," the agency said.

"UNHCR and ARRA are in the process of identifying a suitable site in that
region" it added.

Given the ongoing conflict and food insecurity in the newest nation, UNHCR
together with ARRA and other partners, have also finalised a draft
Contingency Plan to respond to the possibility of a renewed influx of
refugees from South Sudan.

The draft contingency plan foresees the arrival of potential more refugees
in Ethiopia and fund shorting.

(ST)
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules.
Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan
Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the
site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express
yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an
article to [email protected]

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61930#forum>
19 March 05:43, by Paul Ongee

It’s the Nuers who support IO-Riek Machar who are defeated in the battle
fields and fleeing to their relatives in Ethiopia and Khartoum where they
were used as tools for destabilizing South Sudan since 1983. Now most of
them are making the ends meet (struggling to pay bills) in the Western
world and making financial contribution to Io-hotel dwellers who create
rumors, fabrications and lies.

repondre message
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=61930&id_forum=364924>
19 March 05:50, by Paul Ongee

It’s a good news to me in particular. Let them go to Ethiopia or any other
neighboring countries where they will notice a difference between being
refugees from 1983 -2005 and from 2013-present. Does UN care more about
them as it happen from 1983 or not? Riek Machar’s tribal war waged on the
basis of attaining presidency is senseless. They better leave South Sudan
and come back with a new mindset

repondre message
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=61930&id_forum=364925>
19 March 06:00, by Paul Ongee

I don’t think they will take refuge to Ethiopia, reorganize and come back
to South Sudan to fight the senseless war of fake military ranks and
employment opportunities. Those in Diaspora who came and tasted the soup of
combat went back to their respective western countries and resorted now to
fighting only through computer keyboard. which will never make any
difference on the ground.

repondre message
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=61930&id_forum=364926>
19 March 06:25, by Paul Ongee

Those who prefer using violence to transfer power from the democratically
elected President Salva Kiir Mayardit must know that they will never
achieve anything under the sun. Those who make financial contribution for
IO-Riek hotel dwellers are certainly giving up now. Regional politics is
not even making any difference on the ground. SPLM/A is here to stay. Never
hide behind SPLM/A.

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14ope8RO8jWpg-oC95KxA%2Bu_zGARavqdRdFoLshNUaESZxQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to