On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ulrich Klauer <ulr...@chirlu.de> wrote:
> Chris Bagwell <ch...@cnpbagwell.com>:
>
> > To lower confusion, should I
> > release a sox-14.4.1.1-win32 or go as far as a sox-14.4.2-win32?
>
> "Why is the Windows version more recent than the Unix one??" ;-) So I'd
> think 14.4.1.1 is better, or 14.4.1-a or something. It is only a different
> build from the same source after all.
>
> > flac-1.2.1/src/libFLAC/bitwriter.c:286: undefined reference to
> > `_imp__ntohl@4'
>
> I read that the ntohl problem has been fixed in libflac git; but there is
> no new release yet. Shouldn't the old workaround from the mingwbuild script
> still work?
>
I haven't found time to look into it yet but the reason I made that change
to mingwbuild is because of sox git commit
d0647a4f8650f92057274f2412bb8aa79f71a242 . If I recall correctly, I was
getting duplicate symbol failure.
I obvious didn't realize I was totally disabling FLAC/libsndfile. I thought
I was getting rid of duplicate symbol.
So any fix is likely more than a compile change.
Chris
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel