On Aug 22 17:43:28, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > Is it because of the _order_ of the -L options?
>
> Seems so:
>
> cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wstrict-prototypes -fstack-protector-strong -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/sox
> sox.o -L/usr/local/lib -L./.libs -lsox -lpng -lltdl -lao -lgsm -lid3tag -lz
> -lmad -lmp3lame -ltwolame -lopusfile -lopus -lsndio -lvorbisfile -lwavpack
> -lcrypto -lsndfile -lFLAC -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -lm
> -Wl,-rpath,/home/hans/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib
>
> fails, but
>
> cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wstrict-prototypes -fstack-protector-strong -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/sox
> sox.o -L./.libs -lsox -L/usr/local/lib -lpng -lltdl -lao -lgsm -lid3tag -lz
> -lmad -lmp3lame -ltwolame -lopusfile -lopus -lsndio -lvorbisfile -lwavpack
> -lcrypto -lsndfile -lFLAC -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -lm
> -Wl,-rpath,/home/hans/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib
>
> succeeds. The only difference between the two is the -L order, namely,
>
> cc [...] -o .libs/sox sox.o -L/usr/local/lib -L./.libs -lsox -lpng [...]
> cc [...] -o .libs/sox sox.o -L./.libs -lsox -L/usr/local/lib -lpng [...]
This (fail vs succeed) is the case for each of the following:
OpenBSD clang version 10.0.1
egcc (GCC) 8.3.0
gcc (GCC) 4.2.1
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
