On Aug 24 13:27:00, m...@mansr.com wrote:
> Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> writes:
> 
> >> It all works fine on my VM with this environment and no configure options:
> >> AUTOCONF_VERSION=2.69
> >> AUTOMAKE_VERSION=1.16
> >> CC=cc
> >> C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include
> >> LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
> >
> > I see you have changed the install instructions in the INSTALL file
> > (slapping them onto the Aug 14 commit without mentioning it or
> > reflecting it in the commit message). There is a few problems:
> >
> > 1.
> > On some systems, in particular OpenBSD, the autoreconf insists
> > that 'libtool' is the GNU libtool (of course). So the requirement
> > to have autoconf, automake and autoconf-archive probably needs to
> > be augmented with GNU libtool; otherwise,
> 
> Is there any other libtool?

http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/usr.bin/libtool/
http://man.openbsd.org/libtool

        Relative -L paths are put before absolute ones.
        This fixes many (but not all, unfortunately) issues
        when software links to libraries already installed
        instead of those just built because, for example,
        "-L/usr/local/lib" comes before "-L../libfoo".

That seems to be precisely the problem we are seeing
with the GNU libtool if SoX is already installed.



_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel

Reply via email to