On Aug 24 13:27:00, m...@mansr.com wrote: > Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> writes: > > >> It all works fine on my VM with this environment and no configure options: > >> AUTOCONF_VERSION=2.69 > >> AUTOMAKE_VERSION=1.16 > >> CC=cc > >> C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include > >> LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib > > > > I see you have changed the install instructions in the INSTALL file > > (slapping them onto the Aug 14 commit without mentioning it or > > reflecting it in the commit message). There is a few problems: > > > > 1. > > On some systems, in particular OpenBSD, the autoreconf insists > > that 'libtool' is the GNU libtool (of course). So the requirement > > to have autoconf, automake and autoconf-archive probably needs to > > be augmented with GNU libtool; otherwise, > > Is there any other libtool?
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/usr.bin/libtool/ http://man.openbsd.org/libtool Relative -L paths are put before absolute ones. This fixes many (but not all, unfortunately) issues when software links to libraries already installed instead of those just built because, for example, "-L/usr/local/lib" comes before "-L../libfoo". That seems to be precisely the problem we are seeing with the GNU libtool if SoX is already installed. _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel